
Gary Anandasangaree
@gary_srp
Fantastic work by RCMP officers who seized more than $56 million in cryptocurrency from an unauthorized platform—the largest operation in Canadian history. We’ll combat money laundering even further in Bill C-2, because a secure Canada is a strong Canada.

Quebec RCMP
@rcmpqc
NEWS RELEASE
The largest cryptocurrency seizure in Canadian history has just taken place. An estimated sum of 56 million dollars was recovered from the illegal platform Tradeogre.
hrcmp.ca/en/news/2025/0…https://t.co/p0aDDP35dc
The largest cryptocurrency seizure in Canadian history has just taken place. An estimated sum of 56 million dollars was recovered from the illegal platform Tradeogre.
hrcmp.ca/en/news/2025/0…https://t.co/p0aDDP35dc2025-09-18T15:13:33.000Z
2025-09-18T20:12:06.000Z
Analysis on Stance
Add your own analysis on this stanceLet's analyze a past statement from Canadian MP Gary Anandasangaree. Back on September 18th, he praised the RCMP for a $56 million cryptocurrency seizure, calling it "fantastic work" and linking it to anti-money laundering efforts.
This stance receives a score of 0 (Very Against Crypto) for several reasons.
Firstly, the tone is entirely negative. There is no distinction made between illicit activity and the legitimate use of cryptocurrency. By celebrating the seizure and immediately connecting it to money laundering, the tweet reinforces the false narrative that crypto's primary use is for crime. This is a common tactic used to generate public fear and support for restrictive policies.
Secondly, the use of the term "unauthorized platform" is significant. This implies support for a permission-based regulatory system where crypto businesses must seek government approval to exist. This approach stifles innovation and creates high barriers to entry for entrepreneurs, contrasting sharply with a more sensible, rules-based framework that allows innovation while punishing clear bad actors.
While combating crime is a laudable goal, framing crypto itself as the problem, rather than the criminals who misuse it, is a clear sign of an anti-crypto viewpoint. It demonstrates a lack of understanding of the technology's potential for good and a preference for heavy-handed state control.
