We automatically track prominent politicians and the stances they make about crypto.
Track the Latest Stances
Real-time updates on the statements, interviews, social posts, and voting records of prominent politicians so you can quickly see their latest positions on crypto.
Community-Sourced Commentary
Crypto industry experts and community members weigh in on each politician and their stances to determine where they stand on crypto.
I'm drafting a bill to regulate Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) as counterfeit money. Planning a CBDC? Conspiracy. Designing a CBDC? Same as designing counterfeit plates. Launching CBDC? Counterfeiting.
Prison for counterfeiters and their accomplices. No CBDC!
Iran’s terror proxy network is getting richer and MORE DANGEROUS.
The Houthis have built a MULTIBILLION-dollar financial machine through ports, oil, smuggling, crypto, and sanctions evasion—fueling their ability to threaten Americans and global commerce.
@POTUS and @HouseGOP are fighting to cut off the money that funds terror and TAKE ACTION to ensure Americans are SAFE.
Terrorists should fear America. NOT the other way around!
foxnews.com/world/irans-pr…
Americans are being scammed out of billions of dollars while Trump is using crypto to turn the presidency into a profit generating machine. The Clarity Act’s weak rules & carveouts would supercharge fraud & undermine law enforcement.
Quick level-set for the banks:
1) The Clarity Act is fundamentally not about stablecoins, yet it provides far more (14 pages vs the I think one paragraph in GENIUS?) restrictions to what stablecoin issuers can do regarding yield/rewards. 1/x
Doesn’t change the fact that I can read.
And what’s in this bill are loopholes that continue to enable Trump’s crypto corruption. It also doesn’t do near enough to prevent bad actors from using crypto or to safeguard American consumers.
By the way, I’ve made my objections clear several amendments to fix these issues in Committee. You and your Republican colleagues blocked them.
Democrats want crypto ethics rules? Pass the Clarity Act.
@SenLummis: "If my Democratic colleagues are truly concerned about the president’s crypto investments, then passing this bill — not blocking it — is the way to address that."
A no vote tomorrow kills the toughest ethics reform this country has ever put on the books, kills consumer protections for every American holding digital assets, and hands the future of this industry to our foreign competitors.
Americans are being scammed out of billions of dollars while Trump is using crypto to turn the presidency into a profit generating machine. The Clarity Act’s weak rules & carveouts would supercharge fraud & undermine law enforcement.
Tomorrow, my colleagues have a choice to make: American leadership, real consumer protections, and giving law enforcement the tools they need to address illicit finance, or drive the digital asset industry overseas, leaving consumers vulnerable, and sidelining American leadership knowing full well that no other country is capable of regulating this industry as well as the United States. The choice really is that clear. The Clarity Act is right in front of us and this moment won’t come along again for years. Let’s take the win and get this done.
.@SenLummis on the importance to pass the Clarity Act NOW:
"We have earned support from across the digital asset industry, from legacy financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and Fidelity. Even the National Fraternal Order of Police and the National Sheriffs’ Association, both of whom originally opposed the bill, have dropped their opposition. We listened, built in dozens of illicit finance and anti-money laundering provisions, and that’s what got us there.
Title I alone reflects 33 separate bipartisan edits where Republicans and Democrats played key roles. It contains tighter core definitions so that companies cannot structure around securities law; a mandatory SEC “front door” certification with a 90-day review window instead of 60 and new anti-evasion authority so regulators aren’t boxed in by technicalities."
Happy Clarity Week!
Whether you are a crypto enthusiast or a crypto skeptic, you should support this bill.
Great op-ed from @SenLummis outlining the painstaking negotiations between Republicans, Democrats, and industries to get this right.
No excuses - pass the bill.
If Senators want to vote against implementing tough restrictions on politicians for crypto investments then that is up to them.
A majority of Americans will disagree with that choice.
After a year of intense daily bipartisan negotiations, this bill is ready. Here is the final text. President Trump voluntarily agreed to new ethics provisions holding every federally elected official, judge, and their spouses to some of the toughest ethics restrictions in U.S. history. This new text includes more than 120 of Democrats' demands. A no vote on Tuesday means opposing real ethics reforms on politicians' personal investments, handing American leadership in digital assets to our foreign competitors, and leaving Americans with zero protections in the digital asset markets. Democrats got what they wanted; now they need to take yes for an answer. Here's the latest: lummis.senate.gov/press-releases…
In August, we stopped the Clarity Act, but when the Senate returns this week the crypto industry & their Republican flunkies in Congress will try again.
As is, this bill does nothing to stop Trump's crypto corruption or the use of crypto by bad actors.
We can't let this pass.
Clarity Act Update!
Tuesday at 2:15 p.m. ET, the Senate takes its first procedural vote on the Clarity Act.
This is not a vote on final passage. It is a vote to end debate on whether the United States Senate should even consider a bill to regulate digital assets.
We have spent thousands of hours writing a framework so America leads this technology instead of watching it leave. Dozens of Senators have been in the room. It already cleared committee with a bipartisan vote. The House already passed it.
A “no” on Tuesday is not a thoughtful objection to a provision. It is a vote to keep an entire industry in the dark with no rules, no American framework, and let it develop overseas.
That is an absurd position.
If Senators have concerns about the bill, they can offer an amendment after we agree to take it up. That is how the Senate is supposed to work.
To my colleagues : vote yes on Tuesday. Consider the bill. Regulate this industry in the United States. Do not hand the future of digital assets to other countries because we failed to do our jobs.
Section 305 of the Clarity Act needs removed before passage.
Section 305 lets exchanges and stablecoin issuers pause a suspicious transaction for 30 days, extendable to 180 days on a written request from law enforcement. Companies get a safe harbor from civil lawsuits if they ith. Customers may get little or no timely notice or chance to contest the freeze in court first. Effectively, civil asset forfeiture.
The right to transact pre-dates government. It should not be infringed without due process or informed consent.
To abridge this right, they are working to make all payments account-based and permissioned. This completely defeats the point of crypto: permission-less, peer-to-peer payments at the speed of light.
AI model activity in recent weeks has only further highlighted the reality that America must lead in the AI race. Part of that leadership must be commonsense market structure, as we have done with cryptocurrency, to ensure that not only do we have the best models in the world, but we also have the most effective governance structure.
As a former technology entrepreneur, I look forward to working through the Commerce Committee to create commonsense market structure and regulation around AI that does not slow our progress but assures that our progress is responsible.
News: W&M R’s are planning to include a reversal of OBBB’s tax hike on gamblers in their crypto tax package, which they’re expected to mark up next Wednesday
It would resemble Max Miller/Horsford bill to revive the bigger deduction for losses. Package would also include many of the bills from W&M’s legislative hearing on crypto tax
@PunchbowlNews Vault subscribers got the news first
This updated Clarity Act text reflects bipartisan hard work over August—specifying when decentralized-in-name-only DeFi protocols must register with the CFTC and limiting the DeFi provisions to spot and cash transactions, in response to Native American concerns about prediction markets. Overall, this text contains over 100 changes requested by Democrats. Let’s get this done!
lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…
This lawsuit highlights a dangerous gap in the fight against illicit finance in crypto. Right now, exchanges and issuers can’t freeze stablecoins if they suspect illicit activity without fear of a lawsuit. Section 305 of the Clarity Act gives issuers and exchanges the power they need to stop illicit finance in its tracks without having civil liability. coindesk.com/business/2026/…
We didn’t cede the internet to Europe, and we can’t afford to cede digital assets the same way. The Clarity Act allows the United States to write these rules instead of watching from the sidelines while Singapore or the UAE write them for us. Our country has a long history of leading. We cannot break from that tradition.
Under the Clarity Act, digital asset exchanges and brokers get treated as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act. My bill ensures anti-money laundering programs and customer due diligence become real obligations, not voluntary suggestions.
The Clarity Act passed out of @BankingGOP Committee on a bipartisan 15 to 9 vote because my colleagues and I know that we must ensure the United States leads the way on digital asset regulation, and time is running out to secure America’s leadership. Every moment we wait to get this bill to the president’s desk is a moment we risk ceding this leadership to another country. We owe it to American consumers to make sure this industry operates under US regulations and builds on US soil.
If this bill fails it won’t be because of ethics, it will be because Democrats didn’t join Republicans in embracing a bipartisan bill that protected consumers, cements America’s leadership in digital assets, and empowered law enforcement to clamp down on illicit finance.
On sues, Democrats continue to demand changes that would give future regulators the ability to kill the crypto industry. If we can bridge those gaps I’m confident we can pass Clarity, but they require further compromise from Democrats, not the White House.
FTX customers waited for years for bankruptcy courts to claw back their money because current law never built a framework for digital assets. The Clarity Act makes digital commodities customer property in bankruptcy, ensuring consumers are protected and made whole.
Read my new op-ed in @NEWSMAX: Clarity Act Ensures US Will Write Rules for Digital Assets
"The Clarity Act replaces years of regulatory uncertainty with common-sense rules of the road. It establishes clear statutory boundaries between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), gives American businesses predictable standards, and provides consumers protections that Washington failed to deliver under the previous administration."
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
The Gizmodo article below, titled “Crypto Industry’s CLARITY Act Faces Major Setback,” speaks for itself.
You can access the article by clicking the link here: gizmodo.com/crypto-industr…
When a crypto exchange goes bankrupt today, customers are forced to get in line behind lawyers and creditors with low priority in hopes of maybe recouping a fraction of their assets. The Clarity Act ensures consumers’ assets are protected just like they would be with traditional finance. By making digital commodities customer property, my bill ensures people get their funds back first.
Wyoming built a legal framework for digital assets companies years before Washington even started paying attention to digital assets, and we’ve proven it works. The Clarity Act takes that same instinct— clear rules that keep builders here— and applies it nationally.
@RepFrenchHill and our colleagues on the @FinancialCmte have passed HISTORIC digital assets legislation. The House did its job more than a year ago by passing the nonpartisan Clarity Act. It's time for the Senate to ACT.
This legislation establishes strict oversight, auditing, and security protocols for digital assets in the custody of federal agencies. It requires agencies to scan seized electronic storage for cryptographic key material, implement secure extraction and custody standards, and conduct annual audits of held digital assets to prevent loss or unauthorized access.
This legislation establishes a comprehensive ethics and governance framework that directly regulates how federal officials interact with digital assets. Specifically, the 'End Crypto Corruption Act' prohibits the President, Vice President, members of Congress, and Senate-confirmed appointees from issuing, sponsoring, or endorsing cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, or tokens for remuneration, while explicitly preserving their right to hold or trade public digital assets. Additionally, the bill restricts the operation of certain prediction markets by banning registered entities from listing event contracts on political elections, sporting events, or military actions.
The legislation updates federal fraud laws to explicitly protect digital assets and crypto credentials. By amending the definition of an "access device" under federal criminal law, the bill includes cryptographic keys, tokens, digital asset private keys, and recovery phrases. This change ensures that the theft or unauthorized use of these critical crypto security elements is prosecuted under federal fraud statutes, while also increasing criminal penalties for fraud targeting older Americans.
This legislation permanently prohibits the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and Federal reserve banks from issuing or creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC). By amending the Federal Reserve Act, the bill establishes a definitive ban on the development and deployment of a government-backed digital dollar in the United States, halting any administrative plans to implement state-run digital currency infrastructure.
This legislation aims to combat illegal revenue generation and weapons proliferation funding by North Korea, specifically targeting deceptive remote IT employment and identity fraud schemes. It authorizes the Department of State to coordinate with international allies and engage private sector entities, including digital asset platforms, cybersecurity firms, and financial institutions. By enhancing information sharing and tracking illicit money laundering networks, the bill seeks to disrupt North Korea's evasion of global sanctions.
A resolution directing the Senate Legal Counsel to bring a civil action in the name of the Senate to enforce the Foreign Emoluments Clause contained in clause 8 of section 9 of article I of the Constitution of the United States.
Date Introduced: 2026-07-21
Status: Introduced and Sponsored
This resolution directs the Senate Legal Counsel to file a lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump for alleged violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause. It highlights several business transactions as unauthorized foreign emoluments, including a $500 million foreign investment in the Trump family's cryptocurrency project, World Liberty Financial, a multi-billion dollar stablecoin deal involving Binance, and the sale of $635 million in a $TRUMP memecoin to foreign nationals.
This legislation would authorize the President to issue cyber letters of marque and reprisal, commissioning private entities to conduct cyber operations against foreign cyberthreats. In the context of digital assets, these authorized actions include tracking, seizing, and repatriating stolen cryptocurrencies to American victims. The bill aims to combat ransomware and crypto-enabled scams by leveraging private sector capabilities, providing liability protection for operators, and establishing bounty programs funded by a portion of the recovered digital assets, all with the stated goal of allowing lawful digital asset innovation to grow safely.
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that under no circumstances should Samuel Bankman-Fried receive executive clemency, including a pardon or commutation, and affirming the Senate's commitment to the rule of law and integrity of the United States financial system.
Date Introduced: 2026-06-17
Status: Introduced and Sponsored
This Senate resolution expresses the formal opinion of the Senate that FTX co-founder Samuel Bankman-Fried should not receive any form of presidential clemency, including a pardon or commutation. It highlights the massive scale of the multi-billion-dollar FTX collapse, affirms the 25-year prison sentence delivered in 2024, and rejects attempts to characterize his prosecution as "lawfare." The resolution emphasizes that permanent accountability is essential to protect investors and maintain public confidence in financial markets.