DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. U.S. Senators
  3. Maria Cantwell

DoTheySupportIt grades politicians on crypto from how they vote and what they say. How it works

profile picture of Maria Cantwell

US Senator from Washington

Does Maria Cantwell Support Crypto?

Democrat

6 votes · 1 sponsorship · 1 statement

Latest · 2026-09-15Vote on CLARITY ActVery Anti-Crypto
  • @SenatorCantwell
  • cantwell.senate.gov
F
Crypto grade
Very Anti-Crypto
Based on 8 stances

Based on previous comments, Maria Cantwell has indicated they are very anti-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Maria Cantwell has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance

Full record

2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2026-09-15
Bill
CLARITY Act
Details
The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," or "CLARITY Act of 2025," establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over spot market transactions and related entities like exchanges, brokers, and dealers. It aims to differentiate digital commodities from securities, introduce a "mature blockchain system" concept for regulatory exemptions, and protect individual self-custody rights.
Vote
Key Cloture VoteProcedural Action
Significance
Because of the way Senate rules work, CLARITY could not have gotten to a final vote without members voting in favor.
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenatorCantwell
Sen. Maria Cantwell
@SenatorCantwell
The Finance Committee could have come up with a solution to the crisis of rising health insurance costs. They could have met about it yesterday. Instead, they were having a hearing on cryptocurrency.
tweet image
2025-10-02T22:37:18.000Z
Somewhat Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

Commentary on Stance

DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Let's look at a tweet from Senator Maria Cantwell from this past October, where she expressed frustration that the Senate Finance Committee held a hearing on cryptocurrency instead of addressing rising health insurance costs. This statement was rated as "Somewhat Against Crypto," and for good reason. It employs a common tactic of positioning digital assets as a frivolous distraction from "real" issues. While the cost of healthcare is a critical concern, suggesting that Congress cannot walk and chew gum at the same time is disingenuous. The reality is that cryptocurrency is a rapidly growing, multi-trillion dollar asset class that requires serious legislative attention. By dismissing a hearing on the topic, Senator Cantwell signals that she does not see the value in establishing clear, common-sense regulations for the industry. This perspective is unhelpful, as it obstructs efforts to provide regulatory clarity, foster innovation, and protect consumers. This stance is consistent with her broader voting record, which includes voting against the repeal of the SEC's SAB 121 and voting against the GENIUS Act, which would have established a clear framework for payment stablecoins. Her actions consistently demonstrate an opposition to fostering a healthy digital asset ecosystem in the United States.
2025-06-17T00:00:00.000Z
Took stances on a bill between 2025-05-20T00:00:00.000Z and 2025-06-17T00:00:00.000Z
Bill
GENIUS Act
Details
The GENIUS Act of 2025 proposes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines permitted issuers (insured depository institutions, their subsidiaries, and approved nonbank entities) and mandates 1:1 reserve backing with specific high-quality assets. The bill outlines federal and state regulatory oversight options, sets requirements for customer asset segregation, and grants stablecoin holders priority in insolvency proceedings. It also clarifies that regulated payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under various acts. The bill designates issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring compliance with AML, KYC, and sanctions regulations to prevent illicit finance and safeguard national security. It also reinforces U.S. leadership in digital finance by supporting innovation and ensuring the dollar remains competitive in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.
Timeline
2025-06-17
Very Anti-Crypto
Voted against - Final Passage Out Of Senate
2025-06-12
Very Anti-Crypto
Voted against - Key Cloture Vote (Procedural Action)

Because of the way Senate rules work, GENIUS could not have gotten to a final vote without members voting in favor.

2025-05-20
Very Anti-Crypto
Voted against - Key Cloture Vote (Procedural Action)

Because of the way Senate rules work, GENIUS could not have gotten to a final vote without members voting in favor.

Add commentary on this bill
2025-03-04T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2025-03-04
Bill
S.J. Res 3
Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
Vote
Final Passage Out Of Senate
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-01-27T00:00:00.000Z
Sponsored a bill on 2025-01-27
Bill
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
Details
This bill establishes new responsibilities for the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis to improve the resilience of critical supply chains. It mandates the creation of a working group to identify vulnerabilities, promote domestic manufacturing, and leverage emerging technologies for this purpose. Specifically, the bill identifies "blockchain and other distributed ledger, data storage, data management, and cybersecurity technologies" as critical emerging technologies, and methods for authentication and traceability of critical goods.
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2024-05-16T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2024-05-16
Bill
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution
Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of Senate
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill

All positions

  • US Senator from Washington
    3 January, 2025 - 3 January, 2027
  • Former US Senator from Washington
    3 January, 2023 - 3 January, 2025
  • Former US Senator from Washington
    3 January, 2021 - 3 January, 2023
  • Former US Senator from Washington
    3 January, 2019 - 3 January, 2021
  • Former Member of the Washington House of Representatives from the 44th district
    12 January, 1987 - 3 January, 1993

How grades work

Each stance is scored from very anti- to very pro-crypto, and a person's grade is based on those scores. Newer stances can make older ones irrelevant.

Read the FAQ

Keep exploring

  • U.S. SenateWhere every senator stands
  • U.S. HouseWhere every representative stands
  • Crypto billsEvery crypto bill in Congress, scored
  • All politiciansGrades for everyone we track