DoTheySupportIt

Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions FAQs

Made to help create more economic freedom.

Analyze Ed Markey's Stance | DoTheySupportIt

DoTheySupportIt

>

>

Stance from 2022-10-13

>

Add Commentary

Analyze Ed Markey's Stance

Make your voice heard by submitting your own commentary on this stance.

Ed Markey

@SenMarkey

Texas cryptominers are burning fossil fuels, making millions in subsidies, and leaving Texans to struggle with an unreliable grid on the brink of collapse. I joined @SenWarren to demand answers from ERCOT about these payments. We need transparency.

Elizabeth Warren

@SenWarren

Consumers shouldn't have to subsidize cryptomining's profits and exorbitant energy use, which rivals that of entire nations. I'm working with @RepAlGreen to get answers about the risks cryptomining poses to the climate, grid, and energy bills. theverge.com/2022/10/12/234…

2022-10-12T21:29:32.000Z

2022-10-13T17:30:41.000Z

View original post

Very Anti-Crypto

You'll need an account to add your own analysis on this stance.

How pro-crypto is this stance?

Score Commentary (Optional)

In addition to categorizing this stance, you can optionally provide more detailed score commentary documenting your thoughts and opinions for the rest of the crypto community.

﻿