DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. U.S. House
  3. Chip Roy

DoTheySupportIt grades politicians on crypto from how they vote and what they say. How it works

profile picture of Chip Roy

US Congressperson in the 21st district of Texas

Does Chip Roy Support Crypto?

Republican

6 votes · 2 sponsorships · 4 statements

Latest · 2026-08-03Cosponsored Permanent CBDC Ban ActVery Pro-Crypto
  • @RepChipRoy
  • roy.house.gov
C
Crypto grade
Neutral on Crypto
Based on 12 stances

Based on previous comments, Chip Roy has not indicated whether they are for or against cryptocurrencies. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Chip Roy has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance

Full record

2026-08-03T00:00:00.000Z
Cosponsored a bill on 2026-08-03
Bill
Permanent CBDC Ban Act
Details
This legislation permanently prohibits the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and Federal reserve banks from issuing or creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC). By amending the Federal Reserve Act, the bill establishes a definitive ban on the development and deployment of a government-backed digital dollar in the United States, halting any administrative plans to implement state-run digital currency infrastructure.
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-12-11T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepChipRoy
Rep. Chip Roy Press Office
@RepChipRoy
🚨Rep. Roy's Statement After Voting Against the House Passed Conference Report of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2026: "The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) secured major victories that move the Pentagon in the right direction by further dismantling woke policies, ending outdated authorizations of force, and strengthening our military capability. Notably, the NDAA includes legislation I authored delivering a major win for constitutional governance by fully repealing the 1991 and 2002 Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMF). I am proud to have worked on a bipartisan basis with Rep. Meeks and in the past, Rep. Barbara Lee to deliver this victory. Removing these outdated provisions strengthens our constitutional framework by reaffirming that military action must not rely on decades-old statutes. We believe this is the first repeal of an AUMF in Congressional history and thus marks real progress toward restoring proper war powers. Moreover, I am proud that the NDAA implements commonsense protections for fairness and integrity within our institutions by prohibiting men from competing in women’s sports at our Service Academies and permanently eliminating statutory DEI mandates. The legislation also requires the Intelligence Community to provide the American people the truth about the role the Chinese Communist Party played in unleashing the COVID-19 virus. Taken together, these reforms represent meaningful progress toward ending ideological distractions and restoring mission-first focus at the Pentagon. But despite these important wins, the final version of the NDAA contained serious failures that I cannot ignore, including being roughly $8 billion above the House top-line budget - meaning Congress will now have to find $8 billion in cuts just to keep overall spending flat. It also falls short on basic principles like protecting taxpayer dollars from funding gender ideology. While it rightly prohibits TRICARE from covering gender-transition surgery, it still allows coverage for cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers - an unacceptable loophole that continues to funnel defense dollars to subsidize gender-transitioning. The legislation also continues and expands Ukraine funding for 2 years without yet a clear indication from President Zelenskyy on complying with President Trump’s proposed peace plan or any other clear sign the endless war will end. In addition to these (and other) substantive reasons, one of the most troubling failures is the removal of the strong anti-Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) safeguards that House conservatives fought to include earlier this year. The House-passed bill rightly prohibited the Federal Reserve from issuing or testing a CBDC, thereby preventing unelected bureaucrats from having the power to track, monitor, or control Americans’ private financial transactions under the guise of a government-run digital currency. Nor did the Senate rectify its mistaken empowerment of Senators only – as opposed to unelected hard-working Americans – to effectively “sue-and-settle” to recover a minimum of $500,000 in taxpayer-funded damages per violation in disputes with federal agencies. Although this NDAA contains several positive and long-overdue reforms, the increased deficit spending, the inclusion of unacceptable policies that run counter to the department’s mission, and the exclusion of promised reforms like the anti-CBDC policies regrettably required me to vote against the legislation."
2025-12-11T00:06:36.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

Commentary on Stance

DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

In a recent statement, Representative Chip Roy of Texas explained his vote against the final version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2026. This stance is considered strongly supportive of crypto. While Rep. Roy cited several issues with the bill, a primary reason for his 'no' vote was the removal of "strong anti-Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) safeguards." An earlier version of the bill passed by the House included a crucial provision that would have prohibited the Federal Reserve from issuing or even testing a CBDC. This protection was stripped out during negotiations. Rep. Roy’s reasoning aligns with core crypto principles. He argued that without these safeguards, unelected bureaucrats could gain the power to "track, monitor, or control Americans’ private financial transactions." Voting against a must-pass bill like the NDAA specifically because it lacks protections against a CBDC is a powerful and principled stand. It demonstrates a deep commitment to financial privacy and shows he is willing to take significant political action to prevent the kind of surveillance and control that a CBDC could enable. This is not just a statement; it is a legislative action that prioritizes freedom, earning it a very pro-crypto rating.
2025-07-18T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepChipRoy
Rep. Chip Roy Press Office
@RepChipRoy
🚨Rep. Roy Statement on Votes on Digital Assets Legislation: "Today, House Republicans took a significant step forward to provide a market framework to ensure that Americans can innovate with cryptocurrencies. I supported H.R. 3633, the CLARITY Act, to allow such innovation without fear of an uncertain regulatory environment. I was most proud to support H.R. 1919, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act – which will guarantee that Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC’s) are not permitted in the United States. CBDC’s would represent a radical attack on the privacy of Americans and would allow government and financial institutional unchecked power over our bank accounts, and importantly, our freedom to purchase and move about unimpeded by government surveillance. No government power should be able to limit the ability of a citizen to transact pre-emotive lay based on the policy whims of any particular party in power. The Senate should pass this and send it to the President’s desk immediately. Regrettably, I opposed S. 1582, the GENIUS Act because it was passed without the necessary protections to prevent Central Bank Digital Currencies, and I do not believe we should proceed with building out the necessary structures for stable coin or the development of market structures (CLARITY) without the protection against CBDC. Innovation and prosperity is important – but freedom is the centerpiece of both. We should demand freedom first."
2025-07-18T02:07:48.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-07-17T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill
CLARITY Act
Details
The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," or "CLARITY Act of 2025," establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over spot market transactions and related entities like exchanges, brokers, and dealers. It aims to differentiate digital commodities from securities, introduce a "mature blockchain system" concept for regulatory exemptions, and protect individual self-custody rights.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-07-17T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill
GENIUS Act
Details
The GENIUS Act of 2025 proposes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines permitted issuers (insured depository institutions, their subsidiaries, and approved nonbank entities) and mandates 1:1 reserve backing with specific high-quality assets. The bill outlines federal and state regulatory oversight options, sets requirements for customer asset segregation, and grants stablecoin holders priority in insolvency proceedings. It also clarifies that regulated payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under various acts. The bill designates issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring compliance with AML, KYC, and sanctions regulations to prevent illicit finance and safeguard national security. It also reinforces U.S. leadership in digital finance by supporting innovation and ensuring the dollar remains competitive in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepChipRoy
Rep. Chip Roy Press Office
@RepChipRoy
Rep. Roy on GENIUS Act on @glennbeck: "If the crypto bros want to be able to do all this stuff, they need to back us up to defend freedom." #Bitcoin #BTC $BTC
tweet image
2025-07-16T18:17:42.000Z
Somewhat Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepChipRoy
Rep. Chip Roy Press Office
@RepChipRoy
Rep. Roy on GENIUS Act on @glennbeck: "We believe a line in the sand is that we've got to have an emphatic statement from the government of the United States that the government is not going to be tracking your money... This is a country that's supposed to embrace freedom." #Bitcoin #BTC $BTC
tweet image
2025-07-16T18:14:26.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-03-11T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2025-03-11
Bill
H.J. Res 25
Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2024-05-23T00:00:00.000Z
Took stances on a bill between 2024-05-06T00:00:00.000Z and 2024-05-23T00:00:00.000Z
Bill
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act
Details
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal Reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes.
Timeline
2024-05-23
Somewhat Pro-Crypto
Voted for - Final Passage Out Of House
2024-05-06
Somewhat Pro-Crypto
Cosponsored
Add commentary on this bill
2024-05-22T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2024-05-22
Bill
FIT21
Details
This bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, assigning primary jurisdiction over "digital commodities" to the CFTC and "restricted digital assets" to the SEC. It defines key terms like "digital asset," "digital commodity," and "permitted payment stablecoin," and creates a mechanism for digital assets to transition from securities to commodities upon achieving sufficient decentralization. The legislation also outlines registration requirements for various digital asset intermediaries and mandates studies on decentralized finance and non-fungible digital assets.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2024-05-08T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2024-05-08
Bill
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution
Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill

All positions

  • US Congressperson in the 21st district of Texas
    3 January, 2025 - 3 January, 2027
  • Former US Congressperson in the 21st district of Texas
    3 January, 2023 - 3 January, 2025
  • Former US Congressperson in the 21st district of Texas
    3 January, 2021 - 3 January, 2023
  • Former US Congressperson in the 21st district of Texas
    3 January, 2019 - 3 January, 2021

How grades work

Each stance is scored from very anti- to very pro-crypto, and a person's grade is based on those scores. Newer stances can make older ones irrelevant.

Read the FAQ

Keep exploring

  • U.S. SenateWhere every senator stands
  • U.S. HouseWhere every representative stands
  • Crypto billsEvery crypto bill in Congress, scored
  • All politiciansGrades for everyone we track