DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. U.S. Senators
  3. Cynthia Lummis

DoTheySupportIt grades politicians on crypto from how they vote and what they say. How it works

profile picture of Cynthia Lummis

US Senator from Wyoming

Does Cynthia Lummis Support Crypto?

Republican

6 votes · 13 sponsorships · 683 statements

Latest · 2026-09-30Post on X from @SenLummisVery Pro-Crypto
  • @SenLummis
  • lummis.senate.gov
A
Crypto grade
Very Pro-Crypto
Based on 702 stances

Based on previous comments, Cynthia Lummis has indicated they are very pro-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Cynthia Lummis has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance

Full record

2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats demanded crypto platforms give customers clear, plain-language education on digital asset risks and fraud before they invest. The Clarity Act requires it. Democrats voted no.
2026-09-30T16:54:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats negotiated changes to the Keep Your Coins Act, protecting Americans’ right to hold their own digital assets. Their edits are in the Clarity Act, but they still voted against protecting Americans’ right to hold their own digital assets.
2026-09-29T17:54:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats demanded a government study on crypto mixers and tumblers, the tools criminals use to launder digital assets. The Clarity Act mandates it. Democrats voted no on protecting consumers.
2026-09-27T13:52:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Hester Peirce stood up for American innovators long before it was popular, and the digital asset industry owes her a debt it can never fully repay. Thank you, Hester, for years of dissenting against regulation by enforcement and leading the SEC’s Crypto Task Force to bring clear elong. Wishing you all the best in your next chapter.
X profile picture of @HesterPeirce
Hester Peirce
@HesterPeirce
T minus 7
2026-09-25T17:08:59.000Z
2026-09-26T14:05:32.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

Commentary on Stance

DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Senator Cynthia Lummis continues to validate her perfect 100 stance score by publicly honoring SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, who recently signaled her impending departure from the agency. To understand why this recognition is a massive pro-crypto signal, you have to look at the history of the SEC over the last several years. For a long time, the agency relied on a disastrous "regulation by enforcement" strategy. Instead of providing the industry with a clear, workable regulatory framework that recognized the unique utility of digital assets, regulators opted for retroactive lawsuits, broad enforcement actions, and punitive barriers. This approach stifled innovation and created immense, arbitrary regulatory risk for builders trying to act in good faith. Hester Peirce stood as a bulwark against that hostility. She consistently dissented against the agency's overreach and fought for true regulatory clarity—meaning frameworks that actually enable lawful crypto activity and protect everyday access, rather than just imposing heavy-handed compliance burdens designed to choke the industry. By praising Peirce’s legacy of dissenting against regulation by enforcement, Senator Lummis is once again drawing a hard line in the sand. She understands the critical difference between genuine, pro-innovation rules of the road and restrictive, enforcement-heavy measures disguised as investor protection. Celebrating the officials who fought to keep American digital asset innovation alive is exactly the kind of vocal leadership that earns a flawless score. The industry is losing a massive advocate at the SEC, but lawmakers like Lummis are ensuring that the push for true, enabling clarity remains at the forefront of federal policy.
2026-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats demanded that front-end DeFi platforms comply with U.S. sanctions law like every other financial platform. We wrote it into the Clarity Act. Senate Democrats voted against protecting our national security from sanctioned bad actors using DeFi.
2026-09-25T13:50:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats wanted federal consumer protections for crypto ATMs to protect seniors from scammers. The Clarity Act delivers those comprehensive protections. Democrats voted no on protecting seniors from ATM fraud.
2026-09-24T18:49:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Cynthia Lummis reposted the post below
X profile picture of @btcpolicyorg
Bitcoin Policy Institute
@btcpolicyorg
A bitcoin tax cut that raises money for the Treasury. New research from @sekreps and Cornell's Tech Policy Institute scores the de minimis exemption in Sen. Lummis's S. 2207, which would exempt bitcoin purchases under $300 from capital gains tax. Critics warned the exemption would cost the Treasury billions. The brief finds it would instead raise an estimated $859 million over 10 years. The reason is simple: Only 32 to 56 percent of bitcoin owners report their gains today, so the government collects very little from small purchases now. Meanwhile, the tax and recordkeeping burden stops people from spending bitcoin at all. Remove it, and more transactions happen, generating taxable activity elsewhere in the economy. The result holds across nearly every scenario tested, and it still holds at a narrower $200 threshold. Full brief:
tweet image
2026-09-04T14:52:43.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

Commentary on Stance

DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Senator Cynthia Lummis continues to demonstrate exactly why she holds a flawless 100 stance score, this time by championing a critical legislative fix for everyday digital asset users. Recently, the Senator highlighted new research from Cornell tech policy experts supporting her bill, S. 2207. For context, this legislation proposes a "de minimis" exemption, which would free individuals from paying capital gains taxes on digital asset transactions under three hundred dollars. To understand why this is a massive pro-crypto signal, you have to look at the current regulatory friction. Right now, using Bitcoin to buy a cup of coffee or pay for a modest service is classified as a taxable event. The meticulous recordkeeping required for these tiny transactions creates an absurd compliance burden that effectively stops people from using digital assets as a daily medium of exchange. Critics of the industry often argue that providing tax exemptions for digital assets will drain government revenues. However, the data reveals the exact opposite. Because the current tax and administrative burden completely stifles retail spending, removing it will unlock a massive wave of new transactions, generating an estimated eight hundred and fifty million dollars in broader, taxable economic activity over ten years. This is the essence of enabling regulatory clarity. By pushing to remove punitive and arbitrary tax reporting barriers on everyday purchases, Senator Lummis is fighting to let Bitcoin function as a true utility rather than just a static investment. True pro-crypto policy isn't just about allowing people to hold digital assets; it is about creating sensible, friction-free rules of the road that allow Americans to actually use them.
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats wanted digital asset platforms to be formally classified as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act. The Clarity Act does it. Democrats voted no.
2026-09-23T17:48:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats asked for major crypto holders to disclose their stakes and report sales to the SEC and the public. It’s in the Clarity Act. Democrats voted against the same disclosure rules they wrote.
2026-09-22T15:47:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats wanted crypto issuers held to the same fraud liability standard as every other securities filer. The Clarity Act applies Securities Act Section 17(a) liability to digital asset disclosures. Democrats still voted no.
2026-09-21T14:47:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-20T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats demanded audited financial statements for any crypto project raising more than $25 million from the public. It’s in the bill. Democrats voted against the transparency they asked for.
2026-09-20T14:46:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-19T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats wanted exchanges to be forced to delist any digital asset whose issuer breaks disclosure rules. The Clarity Act requires it. Senate Democrats still voted no.
2026-09-19T14:46:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats insisted the SEC keep full authority to police fraud and market manipulation in digital assets. We preserved it word for word. Senate Democrats killed the bill that protects investors from fraud.
2026-09-18T14:44:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Democrats wanted the SEC and CFTC to be formally empowered with rulemaking authority to fight insider trading in digital assets. The Clarity Act delivers it. Democrats voted no anyway.
2026-09-17T21:44:30.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Today’s proposed rule by @fdicgov will breathe new life into the dual banking system. Thank you Chairman Hill for your commitment to state banking, including digital assets and responsible innovation.
X profile picture of @FDICgov
FDIC
@FDICgov
The FDIC Board of Directors today approved a proposed rule that would promote parity between out-of-state state banks and national banks concerning the application of state laws. fdic.gov/news/press-rel…
2026-09-17T14:51:28.000Z
2026-09-17T15:22:16.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

Commentary on Stance

DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Senator Cynthia Lummis earns a flawless 100 stance score for identifying and championing a critical, often-overlooked victory for digital asset banking access. To the average observer, an FDIC rule regarding parity between state and national banks sounds like dry bureaucratic plumbing. However, in the context of digital assets, this is a monumental structural win. For years, federal regulators have weaponized the banking system to choke off the crypto industry, systematically denying basic banking services to state-chartered crypto institutions—most notably, the highly regulated Special Purpose Depository Institutions pioneered in Lummis’s home state of Wyoming. The dual banking system is designed precisely so that states can lead on financial innovation when the federal government is paralyzed by hostility or inaction. By pressing the FDIC to ensure parity and specifically highlighting its importance for digital assets, Senator Lummis is helping dismantle the discriminatory practices that have been used to debank lawful businesses. A perfect 100 score is reserved for lawmakers who actively protect the industry's fundamental rights and push back against state control and surveillance. Ensuring that state-chartered digital asset banks cannot be arbitrarily suffocated by federal agencies is the very definition of protecting banking access and removing hostile regulatory barriers. Lummis continues to prove she understands the deep, systemic plumbing required to keep American digital asset innovation alive and thriving.
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Proud of my longtime staffer, Chris Land, for being named one of The Hill's 25 Most Notable Hill Staffers of 2026. He has led our digital assets efforts and served as the lead policy staffer on the GENIUS Act and Clarity Act negotiations. Congrats, Chris! thehill.com/the-hill-notab…
2026-09-17T13:48:34.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
Glad crypto policy is moving forward in the House this week. @WaysandMeansGOP is marking up its crypto tax bill for clearer, more certain tax rules, and @FinancialCmte is marking up my Strategic Bitcoin Reserve bill. The fight for American leadership in Bitcoin and digital assets will not end.
2026-09-16T14:28:43.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z
Took stances on a bill between 2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z and 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z
Bill
CLARITY Act
Details
The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," or "CLARITY Act of 2025," establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over spot market transactions and related entities like exchanges, brokers, and dealers. It aims to differentiate digital commodities from securities, introduce a "mature blockchain system" concept for regulatory exemptions, and protect individual self-custody rights.
Timeline
2026-09-15
Very Pro-Crypto
Voted for - Key Cloture Vote (Procedural Action)

Because of the way Senate rules work, CLARITY could not have gotten to a final vote without members voting in favor.

2026-05-14
Very Pro-Crypto
Voted for - Vote advancing bill out of Senate Banking Committee (Final Passage Out Of Senate)
Add commentary on this bill
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @SenLummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis
@SenLummis
This afternoon, Senate Democrats proved they were never truly serious about protecting consumers and preserving American leadership. I sat at the table with Senate Democrats working in good faith to get this done while they played games. For over a year, they presented demands and the second we met them, they made new demands and moved the goal posts. Today they voted against real limitations on politicians’ personal crypto investments. They voted against protecting American consumers from the scammers and fraudsters this bill would have shut down. They voted against American leadership, and handed China and every one of our foreign competitors exactly what they wanted. Democrats chose politics over the American people—again. That’s not leadership on their part, that’s surrender to their radical, socialist base. The once-proud Democratic party is anti-consumer and pro-illicit finance, anti-ethics, anti-free enterprise, anti-worker, anti-livable wage jobs, and pro-socialism. The Democrats are now anti-American. Sad!
2026-09-15T19:46:00.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z
Cynthia Lummis reposted the post below
X profile picture of @DarinBMiller
Darin Miller
@DarinBMiller
Quick level-set for the banks: 1) The Clarity Act is fundamentally not about stablecoins, yet it provides far more (14 pages vs the I think one paragraph in GENIUS?) restrictions to what stablecoin issuers can do regarding yield/rewards. 1/x
2026-09-14T16:51:07.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

All positions

  • US Senator from Wyoming
    3 January, 2025 - 3 January, 2027
  • Former US Senator from Wyoming
    3 January, 2023 - 3 January, 2025
  • Former US Senator from Wyoming
    3 January, 2021 - 3 January, 2023
  • Former 27th Treasurer of Wyoming
    4 January, 1999 - 9 January, 2007
  • Former Member of the Wyoming Senate from the 5th district
    14 January, 1993 - 10 January, 1995
  • Former Member of the Wyoming House of Representatives from the Laramie County district
    7 January, 1985 - 14 January, 1993

How grades work

Each stance is scored from very anti- to very pro-crypto, and a person's grade is based on those scores. Newer stances can make older ones irrelevant.

Read the FAQ

Keep exploring

  • U.S. SenateWhere every senator stands
  • U.S. HouseWhere every representative stands
  • Crypto billsEvery crypto bill in Congress, scored
  • All politiciansGrades for everyone we track