Does Jahana Hayes Support Crypto?

Based on previous comments, Jahana Hayes has indicated they are very anti-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Jahana Hayes has made about Bitcoin, Ethereum, and cryptocurrency innovation.

X profile picture of @RepJahanaHayes
Jahana Hayes
@RepJahanaHayes
Cryptocurrency is in desperate need of regulatory oversight from Congress. However, the proposed legislation falls short-A lack of resources would paralyze staff and the most powerful officials would continue to be able to exploit the office for personal profit.
tweet image
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Congresswoman Jahana Hayes expresses concerns about cryptocurrency needing regulatory oversight but also criticizes proposed legislation for its shortcomings. While she acknowledges the need for regulation, her tweet suggests the current proposals aren't sufficient. She points to a lack of resources potentially hindering effective oversight and the risk of exploitation by powerful officials. This stance received a score of 0 (Very Against Crypto) due to her vote against advancing the market structure bill, which, despite its imperfections, was a significant step towards establishing a regulatory framework for crypto in the US. Her opposition to this bill, coupled with her general skepticism, indicates a stance that is not conducive to the growth and development of the crypto industry. It's worth noting that this tweet is from June 2025, so her views may have evolved since then.
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Congresswoman Jahana Hayes expresses concerns about cryptocurrency needing regulatory oversight but also criticizes proposed legislation for its shortcomings. While she acknowledges the need for regulation, her tweet suggests the current proposals aren't sufficient. She points to a lack of resources potentially hindering effective oversight and the risk of exploitation by powerful officials. This stance received a score of 0 (Very Against Crypto) due to her vote against advancing the market structure bill, which, despite its imperfections, was a significant step towards establishing a regulatory framework for crypto in the US. Her opposition to this bill, coupled with her general skepticism, indicates a stance that is not conducive to the growth and development of the crypto industry. It's worth noting that this tweet is from June 2025, so her views may have evolved since then.
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Congresswoman Jahana Hayes expresses concerns about cryptocurrency needing regulatory oversight but finds proposed legislation lacking. While she acknowledges the need for regulation, her criticism centers on resource allocation and potential for exploitation by powerful officials. This stance received a score of 0 (Very Against Crypto) due to her vote against advancing the market structure bill discussed in the linked article. This bill aimed to establish a regulatory framework for digital assets, a move generally seen as positive for the industry. Her opposition, coupled with the negative framing of her tweet, suggests a skeptical view of the crypto space, outweighing her acknowledgment of the need for oversight. It's worth noting that a desire for regulation isn't inherently anti-crypto; responsible regulation can foster growth and protect investors. However, her vote against the bill and the lack of specifics in her critique raise concerns.
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Congresswoman Jahana Hayes expresses concerns about cryptocurrency needing regulatory oversight but also criticizes proposed legislation for its shortcomings. While she acknowledges the need for regulation, her tweet suggests the current proposals aren't sufficient due to lack of resources and potential for exploitation. This stance is not inherently anti-crypto, as reasonable regulation can be a net positive for the industry. However, her vote against advancing the market structure bill, alongside her other anti-crypto votes documented on DoTheySupportIt, paints a clearer picture. It appears Rep. Hayes leans towards stricter regulatory measures, which could stifle innovation and growth within the crypto space. Her specific concerns about resource allocation and potential for exploitation warrant further examination to understand how they relate to the nuances of the proposed legislation. It's important to remember that effective regulation should balance consumer protection with fostering innovation.
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Congresswoman Jahana Hayes expresses concerns about cryptocurrency needing regulatory oversight but also criticizes proposed legislation for its shortcomings. While she acknowledges the need for regulation, her tweet suggests the current proposals aren't sufficient due to lack of resources and potential for exploitation. This stance, while seemingly neutral, leans slightly negative towards crypto. Her focus on potential downsides without acknowledging the potential benefits of well-crafted regulation suggests a cautious, if not skeptical, perspective on the industry. Additionally, her vote against advancing the market structure bill, as reported by CoinDesk, further reinforces this negative leaning stance. It's important for regulations to be effective and not stifle innovation, and her concerns about resource allocation and potential for exploitation are valid. However, without supporting concrete, positive steps forward, these concerns alone don't offer a path towards responsible crypto development.
Quoted from www.coindesk.com on Jun 10th, 2025

"The House Agriculture Committee sent a major bipartisan message with a 47-6 advancement of the U.S. crypto market structure bill on Tuesday, marking the first of several expected developments in the advancement of digital assets legislation expected this week."

Jahana Hayes was one of the representatives who voted against advancing this pro-crypto legislation.

Add your own analysis on this stance
Voted against a bill on Mar 11th, 2025
Bill Name
H.J. Res 25

Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
Add your own analysis on this stance
Voted against a bill on May 23rd, 2024
Bill Name
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act

Details
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal Reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes.
Add your own analysis on this stance
Voted against a bill on May 8th, 2024
Bill Name
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution

Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.
Add your own analysis on this stance