DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. U.S. House
  3. Jake Auchincloss

DoTheySupportIt grades politicians on crypto from how they vote and what they say. How it works

profile picture of Jake Auchincloss

US Congressperson in the 4th district of Massachusetts

Does Jake Auchincloss Support Crypto?

Democrat

6 votes · 1 sponsorship · 15 statements

Latest · 2025-07-17Vote on CLARITY ActVery Pro-Crypto
  • @RepAuchincloss
  • @JakeAuch
  • auchincloss.house.gov
C
Crypto grade
Neutral on Crypto
Based on 22 stances

Based on previous comments, Jake Auchincloss has not indicated whether they are for or against cryptocurrencies. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Jake Auchincloss has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance

Full record

2025-07-17T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill
CLARITY Act
Details
The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," or "CLARITY Act of 2025," establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over spot market transactions and related entities like exchanges, brokers, and dealers. It aims to differentiate digital commodities from securities, introduce a "mature blockchain system" concept for regulatory exemptions, and protect individual self-custody rights.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-07-17T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill
GENIUS Act
Details
The GENIUS Act of 2025 proposes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines permitted issuers (insured depository institutions, their subsidiaries, and approved nonbank entities) and mandates 1:1 reserve backing with specific high-quality assets. The bill outlines federal and state regulatory oversight options, sets requirements for customer asset segregation, and grants stablecoin holders priority in insolvency proceedings. It also clarifies that regulated payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under various acts. The bill designates issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring compliance with AML, KYC, and sanctions regulations to prevent illicit finance and safeguard national security. It also reinforces U.S. leadership in digital finance by supporting innovation and ensuring the dollar remains competitive in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-07-17T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
If the majority whip had gone with my bipartisan Power of the Mint Act, introduced last term with French Hill, instead of his partisan anti-CBDC bill, then it would not be a poison pill to combine CLARITY with CBDC legislation. I've reintroduced Power of the Mint today— it makes Reserve cannot issue a CBDC without congressional authorization, but still permits the Fed to research the issue. The majority whip has another chance to pursue sound policy instead of reflexive partisanship.
X profile picture of @ChadPergram
Chad Pergram
@ChadPergram
The Hitchhiker’s Guide To What’s Stalling the House on the Crypto Bills for the Second Day in a Row Here’s what’s behind the holdup in the House as Republicans try – again – to pass a trio of crypto currency bills. The House deemed this “crypto week” – with the aim for President Trump to sign the GENIUS Act (which creates a framework for stablecoins – tied to other currencies) later this week. But here’s the problem: Time. The Senate And the House being a victim of its own success. First off, the GENIUS Act took four weeks to maneuver in the Senate. The House is trying to do this in a matter of days. Second of all, the House ultimately had to eat the Senate’s version of the Big, Beautiful Bill last month. And, later this week, the House must swallow the Senate’s version of the spending cancellation bill for public broadcasting and USAID. So, the Freedom Caucus and other House conservatives are upset at the House always having to accept the Senate’s legislation. So those lawmakers decided to assert themselves. That tanked the procedural vote yesterday to give clearance to the defense bill and the triumvirate of crypto bills. So, President Trump and yesterday’s holdouts met at the White House to work out a new deal – with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) on the phone. But the people NOT in the room were the people working on the Clarity Act - which establishes guardrails and “lanes” for regulation of crypto in the U.S. So one proposal has been to attach the bill to bar the federal government from creating a cryptocurrency to the Clarity Act. But one source familiar with the discussions characterized that possibility as “toxic.” Meantime, members of the House Financial Services and Agriculture Committees want this linked to the defense spending measure – which is caught up in this mess about the “rule” getting tanked. But Fox is told they can’t attach the Clarity Act to a “must pass” The defense bill qualifies as something which lawmakers absolutely must pass. So a source close to the talks tells Fox that after trying to work this around the various committee chairs, the deal which may have been struck last night with the Freedom Caucus may have collapsed again. That said, there is some criticism of House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN). Emmer is one of the primary backers of crypto in the House. And they’ve failed to round up the votes just to get onto the crypto bills. Meantime, Johnson is in what was described as “a pickle” and is getting an earful for not having this worked out. That said, Fox is told if they can resolve this, the House could still try to move the GENIUS Act quickly – so President Trump could sign the legislation into law on Friday.
2025-07-16T20:57:02.000Z
2025-07-17T04:07:42.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Sponsored a bill on 2025-07-16
Bill
Power of the Mint Act
Details
This bill prohibits the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the Treasury from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) without explicit Congressional authorization. A CBDC is defined as a digital form of money, denominated in the national unit of account, that is a direct liability of the Federal Reserve. The legislation aims to prevent the executive branch from unilaterally introducing such a digital currency.
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-03-11T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2025-03-11
Bill
H.J. Res 25
Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-03-07T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
Trump is transactional. He’s trying to sell out Ukraine. So, the question is—who’s buying Trump? The Kremlin, by buying the Trump crypto coin. And if the president wants to prove me wrong, then release the records like I asked.
tweet image
2025-03-07T21:43:39.000Z
Neutral on CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2024-05-23T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2024-05-23
Bill
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act
Details
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal Reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Somewhat Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2024-05-22T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2024-05-22
Bill
FIT21
Details
This bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, assigning primary jurisdiction over "digital commodities" to the CFTC and "restricted digital assets" to the SEC. It defines key terms like "digital asset," "digital commodity," and "permitted payment stablecoin," and creates a mechanism for digital assets to transition from securities to commodities upon achieving sufficient decentralization. The legislation also outlines registration requirements for various digital asset intermediaries and mandates studies on decentralized finance and non-fungible digital assets.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2024-05-08T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2024-05-08
Bill
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution
Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2023-05-25T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
The Fed and Treasury have been considering issuing a central bank digital currency. My bipartisan bill makes clear that they would need congressional approval to mint a CBDC.
tweet image
2023-05-25T18:03:54.000Z
Somewhat Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z
Jake Auchincloss reposted the post below
X profile picture of @jchervinsky
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
CBDCs are controversial, but we should all agree that the Fed and Treasury can't issue one without explicit authorization from Congress. I applaud @RepAuchincloss and @RepFrenchHill for their bipartisan bill clarifying this important point. Great work! 🔥 youtube.com/watch?v=mSiSBG…
2023-05-18T13:11:38.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2022-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Jake Auchincloss reposted the post below
X profile picture of @BitcoinMagazine
Bitcoin Magazine
@BitcoinMagazine
JUST IN: 8 U.S. Congressmen sent SEC Chair Gensler a bipartisan letter regarding the SEC's #bitcoin & crypto reporting requests, citing its "stifling innovation."
tweet image
2022-03-16T16:06:35.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2022-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Jake Auchincloss reposted the post below
X profile picture of @ppi
PPI
@ppi
ICYMI‼ Yesterday, @RepAuchincloss joined PPI and an esteemed panel of business leaders for a dynamic conversation about cryptocurrency and the potential steps the federal government can take to regulate the fast-growing technology. WATCH ⬇ https://t.co/QRVJDFPmk1
2022-02-18T21:05:01.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2022-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Jake Auchincloss reposted the post below
X profile picture of @ppi
PPI
@ppi
As the federal government continues to debate how to regulate cryptocurrency, PPI is bringing together business leaders for a roundtable discussion about the potential options and the drawbacks of several approaches. Register so you don't miss out ⬇ https://t.co/bVQn3Q1229
2022-02-15T20:05:01.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2022-02-09T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
3. Geo-economic. The USD must persist as the global reserve currency. That may not require a CBDC. Thoughtful research & regulation of fintech, sound monetary policy, rule of law, strong capital markets, a growing economy – these are the critical drivers of USD reserve status.
2022-02-09T18:29:25.000Z
Somewhat Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2022-02-09T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
1. Prudential risk, in the form of run risk and payment-system risk. Registration, audit, and disclosure requirements for stablecoin issuers & custodians are the clear and present next steps.
2022-02-09T18:29:24.000Z
Somewhat Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2022-02-09T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
2. Systemic risk. The FSOC should continue to monitor and report on systemic risk from stablecoins, given how fast the industry is growing, but right now it’s modest and does not justify red tape that could lead to regulatory capture of crypto by banks.
2022-02-09T18:29:24.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2022-02-09T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
The @FSCDems hearing yesterday on stablecoins crystallized three domains of risk that lawmakers must address: 1. Prudential risk 2. Systemic risk 3. Geo-economic 🧵 below ⬇️ https://t.co/h3mTYwHbN8
X profile picture of @YahooFinance
Yahoo Finance
@YahooFinance
"We have to be thinking about stablecoins in particular with 3 domains,” @RepAuchincloss says. “The first domain is prudential risk, really in particular, run risk, reserve volatility risk, payment system risk.” More:
2022-02-09T17:41:15.000Z
2022-02-09T18:29:23.000Z
Somewhat Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2022-02-09T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
Happening now! Join me on @YahooFinance to talk about stablecoins: finance.yahoo.com/video/yahoo-fi…
tweet image
2022-02-09T17:32:06.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2021-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepAuchincloss
Rep. Jake Auchincloss 🟧
@RepAuchincloss
This primary crypto regulator should be tech & market-structure neutral, and eventually fulfill 3 mandates: 1. Compel disclosure and transparency 2. Prevent fraud & abuse 3. Promote the efficiency and resilience of the market
2021-12-09T22:13:01.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

All positions

  • Running to be US Congressperson in the 4th district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2027
  • US Congressperson in the 4th district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2025 - 3 January, 2027
  • Former US Congressperson in the 4th district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2023 - 3 January, 2025
  • Former US Congressperson in the 4th district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2021 - 3 January, 2023

How grades work

Each stance is scored from very anti- to very pro-crypto, and a person's grade is based on those scores. Newer stances can make older ones irrelevant.

Read the FAQ

Keep exploring

  • U.S. SenateWhere every senator stands
  • U.S. HouseWhere every representative stands
  • Crypto billsEvery crypto bill in Congress, scored
  • All politiciansGrades for everyone we track