DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. U.S. House
  3. Lori Trahan

DoTheySupportIt grades politicians on crypto from how they vote and what they say. How it works

profile picture of Lori Trahan

US Congressperson in the 3rd district of Massachusetts

Does Lori Trahan Support Crypto?

Democrat

6 votes · 1 sponsorship · 1 statement

Latest · 2025-07-17Vote on CLARITY ActVery Anti-Crypto
  • @LoriTrahanMA
  • @RepLoriTrahan
  • trahan.house.gov
D
Crypto grade
Somewhat Anti-Crypto
Based on 8 stances

Based on previous comments, Lori Trahan has indicated they are somewhat anti-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Lori Trahan has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance

Full record

2025-07-17T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill
CLARITY Act
Details
The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," or "CLARITY Act of 2025," establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over spot market transactions and related entities like exchanges, brokers, and dealers. It aims to differentiate digital commodities from securities, introduce a "mature blockchain system" concept for regulatory exemptions, and protect individual self-custody rights.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-07-17T00:00:00.000Z
Voted for a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill
GENIUS Act
Details
The GENIUS Act of 2025 proposes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines permitted issuers (insured depository institutions, their subsidiaries, and approved nonbank entities) and mandates 1:1 reserve backing with specific high-quality assets. The bill outlines federal and state regulatory oversight options, sets requirements for customer asset segregation, and grants stablecoin holders priority in insolvency proceedings. It also clarifies that regulated payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under various acts. The bill designates issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring compliance with AML, KYC, and sanctions regulations to prevent illicit finance and safeguard national security. It also reinforces U.S. leadership in digital finance by supporting innovation and ensuring the dollar remains competitive in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-07-17T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepLoriTrahan
Lori Trahan
@RepLoriTrahan
Crypto is here to stay. That’s why we can’t afford to wait any longer to establish guardrails that protect consumers and bring long-overdue transparency to this rapidly evolving industry. I voted YES on the GENIUS Act because it’s a meaningful step toward ensuring that Americans who choose to invest in stablecoins are protected from fraud and abuse. This bill is far from perfect and more must be done to confront the blatant corruption we’re seeing from Donald Trump, who has shamelessly used his position as President to line his pockets with millions in crypto. I’ll keep fighting for strong anti-corruption legislation to stop the kind of self-dealing that’s happening in plain sight. I voted NO on the CLARITY Act. I support a regulatory framework that distinguishes between digital assets, fosters innovation, and promotes responsible growth, but this bill simply doesn’t get us there. It’s riddled with loopholes and carveouts that leave everyday investors exposed to the kinds of volatile, often fraudulent crypto schemes we’ve seen too regularly with memecoins. It fails to strike the right balance between innovation and consumer protection. As the bill moves to the Senate, it’s critical that our colleagues strengthen it, starting with ensuring that states like Massachusetts retain the authority to crack down on fraud and abuse. I believe we can support innovation in the crypto space while standing firmly against the predatory practices that have taken root in the absence of meaningful oversight. The future of digital assets should be built on transparency, accountability, and protections for everyday investors. That’s the balance I’ll keep fighting for.
2025-07-17T20:53:09.000Z
Neutral on CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

Commentary on Stance

DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

In July 2025, Congressperson Lori Trahan (@RepLoriTrahan) made a nuanced statement about crypto, highlighting both its potential and the need for consumer protection. Her tweet expresses support for the GENIUS Act, aimed at regulating stablecoins, while opposing the CLARITY Act due to concerns about investor protection and regulatory loopholes. This position reflects a balanced perspective, earning a stance score of 50 (Neutral on Crypto). Supporting the GENIUS Act demonstrates a recognition of the importance of stablecoins while acknowledging the need for regulatory oversight to prevent fraud and abuse. However, opposing the CLARITY Act raises questions. While the desire for a balanced approach is valid, the CLARITY Act, in its initial form, aimed to provide regulatory clarity to the crypto industry, a crucial step for its growth. Her opposition, based on concerns about investor protection, suggests a cautious approach that could hinder innovation if not carefully considered. Overall, Trahan's stance reflects the ongoing debate around crypto regulation: balancing innovation with consumer protection. Her call for stronger investor protections is important, but it's crucial to ensure that such measures don't stifle the growth and potential of this emerging technology. Her emphasis on state-level authority in regulating crypto also adds another layer to the discussion, highlighting the complex interplay between federal and state oversight in this space.
2025-03-11T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2025-03-11
Bill
H.J. Res 25
Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z
Cosponsored a bill on 2025-03-03
Bill
Consumer Safety Technology Act
Details
This bill, known as the Consumer Safety Technology Act, includes provisions to study blockchain technology and tokens. Specifically, it directs the Secretary of Commerce to study blockchain's potential uses for consumer protection, including fraud prevention, and to identify regulatory modifications that could encourage its adoption. It also mandates the Federal Trade Commission to report on unfair or deceptive practices related to tokens, defined as transferable digital representations on a blockchain, and recommend legislation to enhance consumer protection in this area. The bill acknowledges that tokens and blockchain drive innovation and consumer choice.
Somewhat Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2024-05-23T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2024-05-23
Bill
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act
Details
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal Reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Somewhat Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2024-05-22T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2024-05-22
Bill
FIT21
Details
This bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, assigning primary jurisdiction over "digital commodities" to the CFTC and "restricted digital assets" to the SEC. It defines key terms like "digital asset," "digital commodity," and "permitted payment stablecoin," and creates a mechanism for digital assets to transition from securities to commodities upon achieving sufficient decentralization. The legislation also outlines registration requirements for various digital asset intermediaries and mandates studies on decentralized finance and non-fungible digital assets.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill
2024-05-08T00:00:00.000Z
Voted against a bill on 2024-05-08
Bill
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution
Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.
Vote
Final Passage Out Of House
Very Anti-CryptoAdd commentary on this bill

All positions

  • Running to be US Congressperson in the 3rd district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2027
  • US Congressperson in the 3rd district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2025 - 3 January, 2027
  • Former US Congressperson in the 3rd district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2023 - 3 January, 2025
  • Former US Congressperson in the 3rd district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2021 - 3 January, 2023
  • Former US Congressperson in the 3rd district of Massachusetts
    3 January, 2019 - 3 January, 2021

How grades work

Each stance is scored from very anti- to very pro-crypto, and a person's grade is based on those scores. Newer stances can make older ones irrelevant.

Read the FAQ

Keep exploring

  • U.S. SenateWhere every senator stands
  • U.S. HouseWhere every representative stands
  • Crypto billsEvery crypto bill in Congress, scored
  • All politiciansGrades for everyone we track