
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
@RepMTG
Back in July, I voted NO on the GENIUS Act because it contained a back door to a central bank digital currency (CBDC).
Back then Johnson promised conservatives that he would put Tom Emmer’s bill, that closed the loophole to CBDC, in the NDAA to get our vote on Trump’s bill, the he didn’t keep his promise, it’s not in the NDAA so the CBDC loophole remains.
I support crypto but I will never support giving the government the ability to turn off your ability to have full control of your money and to buy and sell.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
@RepMTG
Remember when Canada froze the truckers (Freedom Convoy) bank accounts and crypto when they protested against vaccine mandates?
Canada NOT China.
Congress is passing a bill today (GENIUS Act) that that opens the back door to a central bank digital currency (CBDC).
The Fed has r years.
The ultimate goal is to move us to a cashless society and digital currency.
House Republicans want a ban on CBDC but the Senate says they don’t have enough votes to pass a ban on CBDC!
Johnson refused to allow us to make amendments to the bill and says he will put the ban on CBDC in the NDAA.
BUT IF IT WON’T PASS NOW, IT WON’T PASS THEN!!!!!
So why are we passing bills to lay the groundwork for a CBDC that can be used against us in the future by another authoritarian regime?????
We saw what a politically weaponized government looked like the past 4 years, just wait until we get another one that can TURN OFF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND STOP YOUR ABILITY TO BUY AND SELL!!!!!
I’M VOTING NO!!!!!
2025-07-17T16:19:12.000Z
2025-12-09T01:56:37.000Z
Analysis on Stance
Add your own analysis on this stanceBack in December 2025, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene provided a clear explanation for her complex but principled stance on crypto legislation, reaffirming her strong support for the industry. This is an important piece of context for understanding her voting record.
Her post explains why she voted against the GENIUS Act earlier that year. While the GENIUS Act was a bill designed to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins—something the industry desperately needs—Rep. Greene opposed it. Her reasoning is critical: she believed the legislation contained a "back door" that could be used to implement a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
This is an exceptionally strong pro-crypto position. For many, the threat of a programmable, government-controlled CBDC that could be used for surveillance and to censor transactions is the single greatest danger to financial freedom. By referencing the Canadian government freezing the accounts of Freedom Convoy protestors, she highlights a real-world example of why centralized financial control is so perilous.
Her willingness to vote against an otherwise positive stablecoin bill out of fear it could enable a CBDC demonstrates that she prioritizes the core crypto principles of self-sovereignty and censorship resistance. Her statement, "I support crypto but I will never support giving the government the ability to turn off your ability to have full control of your money," perfectly summarizes this viewpoint. This commitment to blocking a CBDC, even when it requires a difficult vote, is why her stance is rated as unequivocally pro-crypto.




