Does Nydia Velázquez Support Crypto?

Based on previous comments, Nydia Velázquez has indicated they are very anti-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Nydia Velázquez has made about Bitcoin, Ethereum, and cryptocurrency innovation.

X profile picture of @NydiaVelazquez
Rep. Nydia Velazquez
@NydiaVelazquez
Puerto Rico is set to lose $4.5B by 2026 from tax breaks for wealthy investors, while costs rise & locals are pushed out. My bill will close loopholes for digital assets & end PR’s crypto tax haven status. This bill will help Puerto Ricans shape their own economic future.
X profile picture of @business
Bloomberg
@business
Democratic lawmakers have introduced a bill to block investors from using Puerto Rico as a cryptocurrency tax haven bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Congressperson Velázquez's tweet from April 2025 reveals a concerning perspective on crypto and its role in Puerto Rico. She claims Puerto Rico will lose $4.5 billion by 2026 due to tax breaks for wealthy crypto investors, leading to rising costs and displacement of locals. Her proposed bill aims to close "loopholes" for digital assets and end Puerto Rico's status as a crypto tax haven. While presented as a measure to empower Puerto Ricans, this stance raises red flags for crypto advocates. It's important to understand the context: Puerto Rico has attracted crypto entrepreneurs and investors due to its favorable tax laws, leading to economic growth and job creation. Velázquez's bill, by targeting these very incentives, could stifle this burgeoning industry and harm the island's economy. Furthermore, the framing of crypto investors as exploiting loopholes is misleading. These individuals are operating within existing legal frameworks, and characterizing their actions as exploitative is a common anti-crypto tactic. The implication that crypto investment is inherently detrimental to locals ignores the potential benefits of blockchain technology and the financial opportunities it can create. This stance, scored a 0 (Very Against Crypto), reflects a misunderstanding of the potential of digital assets and a preference for traditional financial systems. It's crucial to advocate for balanced, sensible crypto regulations that protect consumers without stifling innovation. Puerto Rico's experiment with crypto-friendly policies could offer valuable lessons for other jurisdictions, and prematurely ending it would be a missed opportunity.
Voted against a bill on Mar 11th, 2025
Bill Name
H.J. Res 25

Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
Add your own analysis on this stance
Voted against a bill on May 8th, 2024
Bill Name
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution

Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.
Add your own analysis on this stance
X profile picture of @NydiaVelazquez
Rep. Nydia Velazquez
@NydiaVelazquez
The GOP stablecoin bill allows each state and territory to create its own regulatory regime. This could lead to abuse in places designated as high-intensity financial crime areas like Puerto Rico. I appreciate Chair @PatrickMcHenry's commitment to work with me to fix this!
tweet image
Add your own analysis on this stance
X profile picture of @NydiaVelazquez
Rep. Nydia Velazquez
@NydiaVelazquez
For many years, wealthy Mainlanders have been legally allowed to establish themselves as Puerto Rican residents to avoid certain taxes which has made PR especially lucrative for cryptocurrency investors. Watch me question @USTreasury on this issue:
tweet image
Add your own analysis on this stance