Does Rashida Tlaib Support Crypto?

Based on previous comments, Rashida Tlaib has indicated they are very anti-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Rashida Tlaib has made about Bitcoin, Ethereum, and cryptocurrency innovation.

Voted against a bill on Jul 17th, 2025
Bill Name
GENIUS Act

Details
The GENIUS Act of 2025 proposes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines permitted issuers (insured depository institutions, their subsidiaries, and approved nonbank entities) and mandates 1:1 reserve backing with specific high-quality assets. The bill outlines federal and state regulatory oversight options, sets requirements for customer asset segregation, and grants stablecoin holders priority in insolvency proceedings. It also clarifies that regulated payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under various acts. The bill designates issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring compliance with AML, KYC, and sanctions regulations to prevent illicit finance and safeguard national security. It also reinforces U.S. leadership in digital finance by supporting innovation and ensuring the dollar remains competitive in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own analysis on this stance
Voted against a bill on Jul 17th, 2025
Bill Name
CLARITY Act

Details
The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," or "CLARITY Act of 2025," establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over spot market transactions and related entities like exchanges, brokers, and dealers. It aims to differentiate digital commodities from securities, introduce a "mature blockchain system" concept for regulatory exemptions, and protect individual self-custody rights.

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own analysis on this stance
X profile picture of @RepRashida
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
@RepRashida
In 2024, nearly HALF of corporate $$$ in federal elections came from crypto companies. Today's industry-friendly crypto bills lack basic consumer protections, expose our economy to profound risks, and fail to address President Trump’s staggering crypto corruption. I voted NO.
tweet image
Add your own analysis on this stance
X profile picture of @RepRashida
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
@RepRashida
So-called "shadow banks" helped cause the 2008 financial crisis. So why is Congress working to expand shadow banking—via stablecoins—w/ the GENIUS Act? If Walmart and Amazon can issue their own stablecoins, this creates a tremendous concentration of commercial and financial risk.
tweet image
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Rep. Rashida Tlaib's tweet expresses concern about the GENIUS Act and its potential impact on the stability of the financial system. She draws a parallel between stablecoins and the "shadow banks" that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, suggesting that the Act could exacerbate systemic risk by allowing entities like Walmart and Amazon to issue their own stablecoins. This tweet reflects a stance score of 0 (Very Against Crypto) due to its opposition to the GENIUS Act, a piece of legislation designed to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins. While concerns about large corporations issuing stablecoins are valid and warrant discussion about potential market concentration, the GENIUS Act itself aimed to mitigate risks by mandating 1:1 reserve backing for stablecoins and implementing regulatory oversight. By opposing this bill, Rep. Tlaib is effectively hindering the establishment of clear guidelines for stablecoins, which could stifle innovation and potentially push stablecoin activity into less regulated spaces. It's important to note that responsible regulation can actually reduce systemic risk, not increase it.
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Rep. Rashida Tlaib's tweet expresses concern about the GENIUS Act and its potential impact on the stability of the financial system. She draws a parallel between stablecoins and the "shadow banks" that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, suggesting that the Act could exacerbate systemic risk by allowing entities like Walmart and Amazon to issue their own stablecoins. This comparison misrepresents the nature and function of stablecoins, especially those regulated under the GENIUS Act. Shadow banks operated with minimal regulatory oversight and engaged in complex, opaque financial instruments. The GENIUS Act, in contrast, aims to establish a clear regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers, mandating 1:1 reserves and robust oversight. While allowing large corporations to issue stablecoins could raise legitimate concerns about market concentration, the regulatory guardrails within the GENIUS Act are designed to mitigate such risks. Her tweet's stance score of 0 reflects its opposition to a bill that would bring much-needed clarity and regulatory certainty to the stablecoin market, a development widely considered positive for the broader crypto ecosystem.
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Rep. Rashida Tlaib's tweet expresses concern about the GENIUS Act and its potential impact on the stability of the financial system. She draws a parallel between stablecoins and the "shadow banks" that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, suggesting that the Act could exacerbate systemic risk by allowing entities like Walmart and Amazon to issue their own stablecoins. This tweet reflects a stance score of 0 (Very Against Crypto) due to its opposition to the GENIUS Act, a piece of legislation designed to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins. While concerns about large corporations issuing stablecoins are valid and warrant discussion about potential market concentration, the GENIUS Act itself aimed to mitigate risks by mandating 1:1 reserve backing for stablecoins and implementing regulatory oversight. By opposing this bill, Rep. Tlaib is effectively hindering the establishment of clear guidelines for stablecoins, which could stifle innovation and potentially push stablecoin activity into less regulated spaces. This ultimately could increase the risks she's concerned about. It's important to note that well-regulated stablecoins can offer significant benefits, such as increased financial inclusion and faster, cheaper payments.
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Rep. Rashida Tlaib's tweet expresses concern about the GENIUS Act and its potential impact on the stability of the financial system. She draws a parallel between stablecoins and the "shadow banks" that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, suggesting that the Act could exacerbate systemic risk by allowing entities like Walmart and Amazon to issue their own stablecoins. This tweet reflects a stance score of 0 (Very Against Crypto) due to its opposition to the GENIUS Act, a piece of legislation designed to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins. While concerns about large corporations issuing stablecoins are valid and warrant discussion about potential market concentration, the GENIUS Act itself aimed to mitigate risks by mandating 1:1 reserve backing for stablecoins and implementing regulatory oversight. By opposing this bill, Rep. Tlaib is effectively hindering the establishment of clear guidelines for stablecoins, which could stifle innovation and potentially push stablecoin activity into less regulated spaces. This ultimately could increase the risks she's concerned about. It's important to note that well-regulated stablecoins can offer significant benefits, such as increased financial inclusion and faster, cheaper payments.
DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Rep. Rashida Tlaib's tweet expresses concern about the GENIUS Act and its potential impact on the stability of the financial system. She draws a parallel between stablecoins and the "shadow banks" that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, suggesting that the Act could exacerbate systemic risk by allowing entities like Walmart and Amazon to issue their own stablecoins. This tweet reflects a stance score of 0 (Very Against Crypto) due to its opposition to the GENIUS Act, a piece of legislation designed to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins. While concerns about large corporations issuing stablecoins are valid and warrant discussion about potential market concentration, the GENIUS Act itself aimed to mitigate risks by mandating 1:1 reserve backing for stablecoins and implementing regulatory oversight. By opposing this bill, Rep. Tlaib is effectively hindering the establishment of clear guidelines for stablecoins, which could stifle innovation and potentially push stablecoin activity into less regulated spaces. This ultimately could increase the risks she's concerned about. It's important to note that well-regulated stablecoins can offer significant benefits, such as increased financial inclusion and faster, cheaper payments.
Quoted from cointelegraph.com on Jun 11th, 2025

“The US House Committee on Financial Services has advanced a crypto market structure bill called the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, which will soon head to the full House floor for a vote.

House Financial Services lawmakers voted 32 to 19 on Tuesday to put the CLARITY Act to a full floor vote…”

Rashida Tlaib was one of the representatives who voted against advancing this pro-crypto legislation.

Add your own analysis on this stance
Voted against a bill on Mar 11th, 2025
Bill Name
H.J. Res 25

Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own analysis on this stance
Voted against a bill on May 23rd, 2024
Bill Name
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act

Details
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal Reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes.

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own analysis on this stance
Voted against a bill on May 8th, 2024
Bill Name
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution

Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own analysis on this stance