Does Warren Davidson Support Crypto?

Congressman Warren Davidson earns another perfect 100 score for this astute political analysis that cuts to the heart of the legislative gridlock facing crypto. He correctly identifies the central problem: while some Democrats are publicly warming to digital assets, their party's policy-making infrastructure is still heavily influenced by what he aptly calls "Elizabeth Warren’s anti-crypto army." This refers to the network of staff, advisors, and regulators, including SEC Chair Gary Gensler, who favor a hostile "regulation by enforcement" strategy over creating new, clear rules. This approach has stifled innovation and created immense uncertainty for the industry. Davidson's plea for "clear, workable policies" is the most important part of his message. This is not a call to abolish regulation but a demand for the very thing the industry needs most: a predictable and fair framework. He understands that good rules are the solution, not the problem. His question—"Surely, there are at least 10 Senate Democrats who can help?"—is a shrewd legislative challenge. He is implicitly referencing the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster and pass major bills in the Senate. He is signaling his readiness to build a bipartisan coalition and is calling on moderate Democrats to break from the anti-crypto wing of their party to finally establish sensible rules of the road. This is a masterclass in constructive, pro-innovation politics.

Congressman Warren Davidson earns another perfect 100 score for his sharp analysis connecting the fight for executive authority over the Federal Reserve to the existential threat of Central Bank Digital Currencies. He astutely observes that the Fed continues its CBDC development in defiance of a presidential executive order, operating as if it is immune to executive oversight. The ongoing Supreme Court case concerning the President's power to remove a Fed Governor is therefore not just a matter of constitutional law, but a critical battleground for the future of money. Davidson's most crucial insight is his complete rejection of the "wholesale versus retail" CBDC distinction, which he correctly labels a "Jedi mind trick." Proponents of CBDCs often try to downplay the risks by suggesting a "wholesale" or bank-to-bank version is merely a harmless back-end upgrade for financial institutions. His "Hydra" analogy is perfect: a wholesale CBDC is not a separate, benign system, but the foundational body of a monstrous surveillance tool. It creates the central ledger and control points. The "retail" heads, which would interface with the public, can be easily added later. By establishing this backend, the architecture of control is put in place, paving the way for the eventual erosion of self-custody and financial privacy. His uncompromising stance—"No CBDC"—shows he understands that any form of centrally controlled digital currency, no matter how it's initially framed, is a step toward a dystopian future. He is not just fighting a policy; he is defending the fundamental principle of financial sovereignty.

By retweeting a powerful warning from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the dangers of Central Bank Digital Currencies and Digital IDs, Congressman Warren Davidson again solidifies his perfect 100-score stance as a defender of financial freedom. This action is significant not just for its content, but for its context. By amplifying a message from RFK Jr., Davidson demonstrates that the opposition to a state-controlled financial surveillance grid is not a partisan talking point, but a fundamental, cross-party defense of individual liberty. The retweeted post accurately frames the issue in the starkest terms possible: the combination of a CBDC and a Digital ID creates the architecture for a "turnkey totalitarian state." It correctly points to China's social credit system as the logical endpoint of this path, where financial access becomes conditional on state-approved behavior. The quote from Kennedy Jr. is precise: CBDCs "transform every right you have into a privilege contingent on obedience." This is the core of the threat. A programmable, centrally controlled currency is the ultimate tool for social engineering, capable of freezing funds, restricting purchases, and enforcing compliance from a distance. For years, Congressman Davidson has been a leading voice against this dystopian future. He has repeatedly called CBDCs an "existential threat" and has championed legislation to prevent their creation. His decision to boost this message underscores his deep, principled understanding that the fight is not about technology, but about preserving the fundamental right to financial sovereignty. It is an implicit, yet powerful, endorsement of the alternative: permissionless, self-custodial assets like Bitcoin that place control in the hands of the individual, not the state.

Congressman Warren Davidson earns a perfect 100 score for this tweet, which expertly frames the push for CBDCs and Digital IDs not as isolated policies, but as key components in a broader, multi-pronged assault on individual liberty. Using the UK as a "canary in the coal mine," he issues a stark warning to the US. He lists a series of concerning trends—assaults on privacy and speech, high energy costs, and crippling debt—and correctly identifies that the proposed "solutions" of a Digital ID and a CBDC are the capstone of this architecture of control. This analysis demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the threat. A CBDC is not just a new payment technology; it is the endgame for a state that seeks total surveillance and control. When combined with a mandatory Digital ID, it creates a system where the government can monitor, restrict, and even block transactions at will. Furthermore, his mention of "ridiculous energy costs due to climatologists" is a subtle but important jab at the narratives often used to attack Proof-of-Work cryptocurrencies. He shows skepticism towards the top-down energy policies that create economic hardship and are weaponized against decentralized technologies like Bitcoin. By connecting government debt, privacy, energy policy, and CBDCs, Davidson shows he grasps the full picture. He understands that the fight for sound, permissionless money is inseparable from the broader fight for freedom. This is not just a policy position; it is a principled defense of individual sovereignty.

Congressman Warren Davidson earns a perfect 100 score for this powerful and unequivocal rejection of Central Bank Digital Currencies. He correctly frames the issue not as a technological upgrade, but as an "existential threat to Western civilization." His analysis is precise. A CBDC, by its very nature, "inserts the government between you and your money." This fundamentally alters the nature of ownership. Instead of holding an asset directly, you would hold a liability of the central bank, accessible only through a permissioned system. This leads to his most critical point: a CBDC makes access to your money "conditional." This is the core of the threat. In such a system, a central authority could program rules directly onto your funds. They could restrict certain purchases, implement negative interest rates, set expiration dates on your savings, or, as the post he references suggests, cut off access entirely for non-compliance with government mandates. This turns money from a tool of freedom into an instrument of control. By also including Digital ID in his warning, Davidson demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the broader agenda. CBDCs and Digital IDs are inextricably linked. Together, they create a comprehensive infrastructure for surveillance and social engineering that extends far beyond finance. This stance is a full-throated defense of the principles that underpin cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin: self-custody, permissionless transactions, and individual sovereignty. It is a rejection of an authoritarian future in favor of one where individuals control their own economic lives.

In a recent tweet, Congressman Warren Davidson provides a powerful analysis of the path to financial serfdom, earning a perfect 100 score. He connects the dots between irresponsible fiscal policy and the imposition of authoritarian control mechanisms, astutely observing: "The massive deficits lead to a fiscal and monetary crash site where CBDC and digital ID will be imposed as the solution." This is a critical insight. Davidson understands that systems of control like CBDCs and Digital IDs are not introduced in a vacuum. They are often presented as the "only solution" during a crisis. Unchecked government spending and ballooning deficits create the very monetary instability that will be used as justification for these tools. A government can then pitch a CBDC as a way to efficiently distribute funds, monitor economic activity, and maintain order—all while gaining unprecedented surveillance and control over citizens' financial lives. His call to "Reject them all" is a firm, principled stand. He isn't just rejecting the dystopian technology; he is rejecting the flawed premise that leads to it. He correctly identifies that the real solution is not a new form of centrally controlled money but a restoration of fiscal discipline and limited government. This perspective is fundamentally aligned with the ethos of Bitcoin. By advocating for a government that operates within its constitutional limits, he champions the very principles of individual sovereignty and freedom that decentralized technologies are built to protect. He sees the problem not as a technological one, but as a political one, and that is precisely why his stance is so strong.

In a tweet from early September 2025, Congressman Warren Davidson offered a short but powerful declaration of his principles: "Oh, hell no! No CBDC!" This emphatic rejection earns a perfect score for its direct and uncompromising defense of financial freedom. Davidson was responding to a post that featured economist Eswar Prasad, who is associated with the World Economic Forum. Prasad has been notably candid about the potential for Central Bank Digital Currencies to be "programmable." This is the core of the threat that CBDCs pose. Programmable money means a central authority could place restrictions directly onto your funds—dictating what you can buy, setting expiration dates on your savings, or automatically deducting fines. It represents a potential for unprecedented surveillance and control over an individual's economic life. The Congressman's visceral "Oh, hell no!" is the correct and only appropriate response to this authoritarian vision. It shows he understands that the debate is not about modernizing money, but about preserving individual sovereignty. This stands in stark contrast to the principles of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which are built to empower the individual through self-custody and permissionless transactions. This is not a nuanced policy disagreement; it is a fundamental stand for liberty. Davidson's consistent, forceful opposition to CBDCs is one of the clearest indicators of his pro-crypto stance, earning a 100 score.

Congressman Warren Davidson, in a tweet from August 2025, draws a powerful and insightful parallel between the erosion of physical privacy in hardware and the looming threat to financial sovereignty in digital assets. He references a tweet about the Blackberry, whose removable battery offered users a tangible kill switch for surveillance. This is contrasted with modern devices that are perpetually active, creating a constant potential for monitoring. Davidson astutely applies this analogy to the world of crypto. He correctly identifies self-custody as the digital equivalent of this principle. It is the ability for an individual to hold and control their own assets without reliance on a third party, effectively serving as the "off switch" from potential surveillance and control by centralized entities. The "existential threat" he refers to is the ongoing push from some regulators and proponents of systems like CBDCs to eliminate or severely restrict self-custody, forcing all financial activity through permissioned, easily monitored channels. His closing statement, "Freedom surrendered is rarely reclaimed," is a stark and accurate warning. Once the infrastructure for financial freedom is dismantled in favor of one of control, rebuilding it is a monumental, if not impossible, task. This clear-eyed defense of a foundational crypto principle—the right to be your own bank—is precisely why this stance earns a perfect 100. It's a fundamental argument for liberty in the digital age.

Congressman Warren Davidson hits the nail on the head by highlighting the crucial importance of the debate surrounding the future of money. He correctly points out that this vital conversation is being stifled while central banks quietly forge ahead with their CBDC development plans. This suppression of open dialogue is deeply concerning, as it prevents a thorough examination of the potential benefits and drawbacks of CBDCs, particularly their implications for individual financial freedom and privacy. Davidson's quoted tweet from Frank Corva further emphasizes this point. Corva questions whether America is truly committed to becoming the global leader in not just regulated crypto products like ETFs, but also in the core principles of peer-to-peer transactions and individual liberty that underpin the crypto ethos. This distinction is crucial. While embracing regulated ETFs might attract institutional investment, it doesn't necessarily advance the cause of decentralized finance and individual empowerment that many crypto advocates champion. True leadership in the crypto space requires a commitment to both innovation and the preservation of fundamental freedoms. Davidson's consistent advocacy for these principles, along with his highlighting of the ongoing CBDC development by central banks, earns him another perfect 100 score. He understands that the future of money is not just about technological advancement, but also about safeguarding the individual's right to financial sovereignty.

Congressman Warren Davidson expresses his astonishment at the prosecution of Roman Storm, linking it to the Biden administration's perceived "war on crypto." He rightly points out the injustice of holding developers accountable for the actions of users, drawing a powerful analogy to prosecuting gun manufacturers for the misuse of their products. This comparison highlights the absurdity of blaming tool creators for how those tools are employed, especially in a decentralized environment like crypto. Davidson's quoted tweet from Coin Center provides a detailed breakdown of the Storm verdict, further emphasizing the flawed legal interpretation that led to the conviction. Coin Center's key takeaways highlight the court's overly broad definition of "money transmission," which disregarded existing FinCEN guidance and ultimately constrained the jury's ability to consider the facts objectively. This legal overreach sets a dangerous precedent, potentially chilling innovation and discouraging developers from contributing to the crypto ecosystem. The tweet also underscores the importance of the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), which aims to clarify the definition of money transmission and protect non-controlling developers. While the BRCA, attached to the CLARITY Act, has passed the House, its fate in the Senate remains uncertain. Davidson's tweet serves as a call to action, urging the Senate to pass the BRCA and provide much-needed regulatory clarity to the crypto industry. His unwavering support for developers and his understanding of the chilling effect of overzealous prosecution earn him another perfect 100 score. He recognizes that a thriving crypto ecosystem requires a legal framework that protects innovators and fosters responsible development, not one that stifles progress through misapplied regulations.

Congressman Warren Davidson raises a critical question about potential hidden spending within the Federal Reserve, speculating on the allocation of funds towards CBDC development. Linking this to a news report about President Trump's challenge to Fed Chair Jerome Powell over renovation costs, Davidson cleverly insinuates that the Fed might be diverting funds towards a CBDC project without proper transparency or accountability. His call to "Audit the Fed" reflects a growing concern among many about the central bank's lack of transparency, particularly regarding its exploration of a CBDC. This concern is amplified by the potential for a CBDC to become a tool for government surveillance and control over individual finances. Davidson's concluding remark, "Ban CBDC," reinforces his unwavering stance against the implementation of a central bank digital currency. He has been a vocal critic of CBDCs, consistently highlighting the risks they pose to financial freedom and privacy. By connecting the potential for undisclosed CBDC spending with the need for a Fed audit, he effectively rallies support for his anti-CBDC stance. This proactive approach to safeguarding individual financial sovereignty is precisely why Davidson consistently earns a perfect 100 score from us. He understands that true financial freedom requires transparency and accountability from our central banking institutions, especially when it comes to potentially transformative technologies like CBDCs.

Congressman Warren Davidson's assessment of the current state of crypto legislation reveals a concerning knowledge gap within Congress regarding stablecoins, coupled with a troubling appetite for CBDCs among Democrats. He notes that most members lack a basic understanding of stablecoins, which is worrisome given their growing importance in the digital asset ecosystem. His claim that nearly all Democrats, save for two, favor a CBDC paints a stark picture of the partisan divide on this issue. A CBDC, while potentially offering some benefits, carries significant risks to individual financial freedom and privacy, making widespread support for it among one party a concerning development. Davidson's tweet also highlights some positive developments. He praises Chairman Hill's amendments to the Clarity Act, suggesting they would improve the Genius Act. The Clarity Act, designed to provide regulatory clarity for digital commodities, is seen as a crucial step towards establishing a robust framework for the crypto industry. The Genius Act, focused on stablecoin regulation, has been a subject of much debate, and any improvements are welcome. Davidson also acknowledges the Senate's progress in advancing the "base product" out of the Senate, indicating movement towards a more defined regulatory landscape. However, he also points out the need for stronger language in Emmer's Anti-CBDC Act, emphasizing the importance of robust safeguards against the potential overreach of a CBDC. His call for tighter language reflects a commitment to ensuring that any CBDC implementation is met with stringent protections for individual financial sovereignty. Overall, Davidson's measured optimism, tempered by a realistic assessment of the challenges ahead, underscores his commitment to responsible and balanced crypto regulation. His insights and continued advocacy for sound policy earn him another perfect 100 score from us.

Congressman Warren Davidson continues his sharp critique of the Genius Act, exposing its potential to further empower traditional banks at the expense of the crypto ecosystem. He argues that the Act is designed to funnel all crypto transactions through banks, effectively eliminating the decentralized and permissionless nature of cryptocurrencies. This is a critical observation, as it strikes at the heart of what makes crypto revolutionary. By forcing all flows through traditional banking rails, the Genius Act would stifle innovation and reinforce the very institutions crypto seeks to disrupt. Furthermore, Davidson points out the Act's failure to protect self-custody, a cornerstone of financial freedom in the crypto space. Self-custody, the ability to hold and control one's own digital assets without relying on third parties, is essential for preserving individual financial sovereignty. By neglecting to protect self-custody, the Genius Act opens the door to potential government overreach and censorship, undermining the core principles of decentralization. In his earlier tweet, Davidson highlights another troubling aspect of the Genius Act: its preferential treatment of banks regarding stablecoin interest. He reveals that the Act would grant banks the exclusive right to offer interest on stablecoins, effectively banning other entities, including current stablecoin issuers, from doing so. This provision would create an uneven playing field, further consolidating power within the traditional banking system and stifling competition from decentralized platforms. Davidson's consistent and insightful criticisms of the Genius Act underscore his commitment to a truly decentralized and empowering financial future, earning him yet another perfect 100 score from us. He understands that true innovation requires a regulatory framework that fosters competition and protects individual financial sovereignty, not one that reinforces the existing power structures of traditional finance.

Congressman Warren Davidson continues to be a stalwart defender of financial freedom, this time by highlighting the hidden dangers within the Genius Act. He points out that the Act could inadvertently pave the way for a layered Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) system. This is a crucial point that often gets overlooked in the discussion surrounding stablecoin regulation. While the Genius Act might appear to focus on stablecoins, Davidson argues that its underlying architecture could be easily adapted to support a CBDC, complete with all its potential for surveillance and control. He rightly draws a parallel to China's social credit system, where CBDCs are linked to individual behavior, demonstrating the chilling potential for abuse inherent in such systems. Davidson's emphasis on the "layered" nature of the potential CBDC system is particularly insightful. He explains how a seemingly innocuous stablecoin interface could conceal a CBDC backend, allowing for the gradual implementation of a system that ultimately erodes individual financial sovereignty. His firm opposition to the Genius Act, unless accompanied by a robust CBDC ban and strong self-custody protections, underscores his commitment to true financial freedom and decentralization. This unwavering stance against government overreach in the digital asset space is precisely why he maintains a perfect 100 score from us.

Congressman Warren Davidson lays out a critical analysis of the upcoming "Crypto Week" in the House, highlighting both the potential and the pitfalls of the legislative agenda. He correctly identifies the core value proposition of crypto: enabling fast, secure, and private transactions without intermediaries, mirroring the characteristics of cash. This aligns perfectly with our understanding of crypto's potential to revolutionize finance. Davidson outlines President Trump's executive order on digital assets, focusing on four key objectives: banning CBDCs, protecting self-custody, regulating stablecoins, and creating a market structure bill (the Clarity Act). His strong support for a CBDC ban and self-custody protection is commendable. These are essential for preserving financial freedom and preventing the dystopian surveillance potential of CBDCs. His concern about the legislative strategy surrounding the GENIUS Act is also well-placed. By passing the GENIUS Act without amendments and treating the CBDC ban and Clarity Act as separate, likely doomed initiatives, the House risks achieving only a partial victory, leaving key aspects of crypto regulation unaddressed. Davidson's opposition to the GENIUS Act in its current form demonstrates his commitment to comprehensive and meaningful crypto legislation, not just piecemeal solutions that fail to address the core tenets of decentralization and individual financial sovereignty. His unwavering stance earns him another perfect 100 score from us.

Congressman Warren Davidson continues his strong advocacy for self-custody, highlighting its crucial role as the defining characteristic of true cryptocurrency. He emphasizes that an account-based future for digital assets fails to challenge the existing financial system and may even pave the way for a layered Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) system. This is a critical insight. True disruption of the financial status quo requires a shift away from centralized, account-based systems towards decentralized, self-custodial models. In his quoted tweet, Davidson suggests a possible connection between the delays in establishing clear regulatory guidelines for digital assets and the Federal Reserve's ongoing CBDC project. He raises the concerning possibility that these delays are intentional, serving as a stalling tactic while a CBDC is developed. This aligns with the concerns of many in the crypto community who worry that a CBDC could be used to exert greater control over individuals' finances. Davidson's consistent focus on self-custody serves as a bulwark against this potential threat. He understands that self-custody, the ability to hold and control one's own digital assets without relying on intermediaries, is essential for preserving financial freedom and preventing the very real dangers of a CBDC-controlled future. His unwavering support for self-custody and his perfect 100 score from us reflect his deep commitment to a truly decentralized and empowering financial future.

Congressman Warren Davidson once again demonstrates his unwavering commitment to financial freedom with his powerful denunciation of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). He correctly identifies the inherent dangers of CBDCs, labeling them a "creepy surveillance tool" that could be used for "coercion and control." This is not hyperbole. A CBDC system would grant central banks unprecedented access to individuals' financial transactions, enabling them to track spending habits, freeze accounts, and even censor certain types of transactions. This level of control is antithetical to the principles of a free and open society. Davidson's warning about a potential central bank-led financial crisis, where CBDCs are presented as the only solution, is a chilling reminder of the potential for manufactured crises to be used to advance agendas that erode individual liberties. His characterization of CBDCs as an "existential threat to Western civilization" may seem dramatic, but it reflects a deep understanding of the potential consequences of handing over complete control of money to centralized authorities. His consistent and vocal opposition to CBDCs is a crucial part of the fight to preserve financial freedom and prevent the dystopian future envisioned by many CBDC proponents. This stance reaffirms his perfect 100 score from us.

Congressman Warren Davidson's unwavering stance against Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) is a beacon of hope for those who value financial freedom and privacy. His characterization of CBDCs as "the one ring to rule them all," a reference to the Lord of the Rings, perfectly encapsulates the immense power these digital currencies would grant to central banks. He rightly points out that CBDCs could easily be weaponized, transforming money from a medium of exchange into a tool for surveillance, coercion, and control. His quoted tweet, featuring a Tucker Carlson interview with Catherine Austin Fitts, further emphasizes this point. Fitts, a former government official, argues that America's leaders have been actively working to create a "digital prison" to control the population. While some of Fitts' claims may seem far-fetched, her concerns about the potential for CBDCs to erode individual liberties are shared by many within the crypto community. A CBDC system could give governments unprecedented access to individuals' financial transactions, enabling them to track spending habits, freeze accounts, and even censor certain types of transactions. This level of control is antithetical to the principles of a free and open society. Davidson's consistent opposition to CBDCs and his perfect score from us reflect his deep understanding of the dangers they pose. He continues to champion a future where individuals, not governments, control their financial destinies. His advocacy for sound money principles, coupled with his support for decentralized cryptocurrencies, offers a powerful counter-narrative to the centralized control envisioned by proponents of CBDCs.

Congressman Warren Davidson's analysis of the Federal Reserve's recent crypto announcement is a crucial reminder that the fight for truly decentralized finance is far from over. While the apparent ending of Operation Chokepoint and the opening up of banking for crypto companies seem positive on the surface, Davidson astutely points out the hidden agenda: bolstering the biggest banks. This move, while seemingly pro-crypto, could ultimately consolidate power within traditional financial institutions, hindering the decentralized and permissionless nature of true crypto. He's right to highlight the Fed's continued attempts to maintain an account-based system for crypto, which undermines the core principle of self-custody. Self-custody is the bedrock of financial freedom in the crypto space, allowing individuals to control their assets without relying on intermediaries. The quoted tweet by Caitlin Long provides further context, referencing a concerning anti-crypto statement from the Biden White House and the Fed back in January 2023. The fact that the Fed has rescinded other anti-crypto statements but kept this one in place is a clear signal of their underlying intentions. Davidson's consistent advocacy for self-custody and his perfect score from us reflect his deep understanding of the importance of individual financial sovereignty. He continues to champion a future where individuals, not institutions or governments, control their financial destinies.

Congressman Warren Davidson's assertion that commodity-backed stablecoins should be regulated as payment stablecoins is a crucial step towards sensible regulation. His clear understanding of the nature of these assets is vital for the future of sound money. By recognizing them as payment stablecoins, he acknowledges their primary function as a medium of exchange, rather than as securities or other investment vehicles. This distinction is critical for fostering innovation and preventing regulatory overreach that could stifle the growth of this promising technology. His consistent advocacy for clear and appropriate regulation, coupled with his unwavering support for self-custody and his opposition to CBDCs, reinforces his perfect score from us. He continues to champion a future where individuals have greater control over their financial destinies.

Congressman Warren Davidson's commentary on the STABLE Act and the importance of protecting self-custody is a critical reminder of the ongoing battle for the future of finance. While the STABLE Act represents progress compared to the disastrous GENIUS Act, Davidson rightly emphasizes that neither bill is acceptable in its current form. His unwavering focus on self-custody is paramount. Without explicit legal protections for self-custody, any regulatory framework for stablecoins risks transforming the innovative potential of crypto into a permissioned and controlled system, mirroring the very traditional finance structures it seeks to disrupt. Davidson's warning that without these protections, legal challenges against regulatory overreach will likely fail, is a sobering assessment of the current legal landscape. He underscores the very real threat of hostile regulators attempting to stifle innovation and control individual access to digital assets. The fact that regulators have already made such proposals, coupled with the Democrats' numerous amendments and extended debate on the issue, clearly demonstrates their intent to exert greater control over the crypto space. Davidson's continued vigilance and advocacy for self-custody are essential to preserving the core principles of decentralization and individual financial freedom. His firm stance on this issue reinforces his perfect score from us, highlighting his commitment to a future where individuals, not governments, control their financial destinies.

Congressman Warren Davidson's insightful commentary on stablecoins and U.S. Treasuries underscores the growing importance of stablecoins in the global financial system. He highlights the potential for U.S. dollar stablecoins to bolster demand for Treasuries, while simultaneously enabling secure and rapid individual payments. This is a crucial point, as it demonstrates the potential for mutually beneficial integration between traditional finance and the digital asset space. His emphasis on protecting self-custody and preserving existing state regulatory pathways, such as the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), is also commendable. This approach recognizes the need for a balanced regulatory framework that fosters innovation while safeguarding individual rights and preventing overreach by federal authorities. The quoted tweet from Paolo Ardoino, CTO of Tether, provides further context, revealing that Tether was the 7th largest buyer of U.S. Treasuries in 2024. This demonstrates the significant role stablecoin issuers are already playing in the Treasury market, and reinforces Davidson's point about the potential for stablecoins to stabilize demand. His consistent advocacy for clear and balanced stablecoin legislation, coupled with his firm stance against CBDCs, continues to earn him a perfect score from us. He understands the transformative potential of this technology and is working to ensure its responsible development within a free and open market.

Congressman Warren Davidson's retweet of our analysis further underscores his commitment to sound monetary principles and innovative financial solutions. Our original commentary highlighted the Congressman's astute observations on the advantages of commodity-backed stablecoins, particularly their representation of a direct claim to a physical asset like gold. This characteristic distinguishes them from stablecoins backed by fiat currencies or government bonds, which are susceptible to default and liquidity risks. Even Treasuries, as Davidson correctly pointed out, carry these inherent risks. Gold, in contrast, offers a degree of stability that fiat-backed assets often fail to achieve. While the potential for fraud exists in any system, the intrinsic value and tangible nature of gold provide a robust foundation for a stablecoin. This makes commodity-backed stablecoins an attractive option for those seeking a more secure and dependable store of value within the digital asset landscape. Davidson's continued advocacy for these principles reinforces his perfect score, reflecting his unwavering support for a more resilient and transparent financial system.

Congressman Warren Davidson hits the nail on the head yet again with his insightful comments on commodity-backed stablecoins. He rightly points out their key advantage: they represent a direct claim to a physical asset, such as gold. This is a crucial distinction from stablecoins backed by fiat currencies or government bonds, which carry inherent default and liquidity risks. As Davidson points out, even Treasuries are not immune to these risks. Gold, on the other hand, offers a level of stability that fiat-backed assets often struggle to match. While the possibility of fraud always exists, the inherent value and tangible nature of gold provide a strong foundation for a stablecoin. This makes commodity-backed stablecoins a compelling alternative for those seeking a more secure and reliable store of value in the digital asset space. His unwavering support for sound money principles and innovative financial solutions continues to earn him a perfect score from us.

Congressman Warren Davidson's retweet of David Sacks' announcement regarding President Trump establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve is incredibly bullish for Bitcoin, and crypto more broadly. This move by the US Treasury to treat Bitcoin as a reserve asset, similar to gold, legitimizes it on a global scale. While the quoted tweet is from back in March 2025, the implications are still felt today. Holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset acknowledges its potential as a store of value and a hedge against inflation. This action also sets a precedent for other nations to follow, potentially leading to wider adoption of Bitcoin by central banks worldwide. The fact that the Treasury will treat other cryptocurrencies as inventory suggests a focus on Bitcoin as the primary digital reserve asset, which further strengthens its position. Davidson's added commentary on civil asset forfeiture reinforces his commitment to individual property rights, a principle that aligns perfectly with the ethos of Bitcoin and the decentralized movement. His consistent opposition to CBDCs and support for sound money principles further solidifies his position as a champion for the crypto community.

Congressman Warren Davidson continues to be a strong advocate for sound money and the benefits of stablecoins. His recent tweet thread on stablecoin legislation is a must-read for anyone interested in the future of finance. He correctly points out two key advantages of stablecoins over traditional bank deposits: reserve requirements and self-custody. The Silicon Valley Bank collapse highlighted the risks of fractional reserve banking, while stablecoins offer the security of 1:1 or higher reserves, often with regular audits. He also emphasizes the importance of self-custody, enabling permissionless and near-instantaneous payments. This is a stark contrast to the limitations of traditional finance, where intermediaries can slow down transactions and even block access to funds. Davidson goes on to advocate for clear, state-regulated legislation that protects the right to self-custody stablecoins. He highlights the distinction between commodity-backed stablecoins (like Paxos Gold) and traditional stablecoins (like Gemini Dollar), explaining how each type works. His strong opposition to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) is also noteworthy. He recognizes the potential for CBDCs to become tools of government surveillance and control, a concern shared by many in the crypto community. This clear and insightful commentary on stablecoins and their potential benefits earns him a well-deserved perfect score of 100. He understands the transformative power of this technology and is working to ensure its responsible development within a free and open market.

Congressman Warren Davidson continues to be a strong advocate for sound money and the benefits of stablecoins. His recent tweet thread on stablecoin legislation is a must-read for anyone interested in the future of finance. He correctly points out two key advantages of stablecoins over traditional bank deposits: reserve requirements and self-custody. The Silicon Valley Bank collapse highlighted the risks of fractional reserve banking, while stablecoins offer the security of 1:1 or higher reserves, often with regular audits. He also emphasizes the importance of self-custody, enabling permissionless and near-instantaneous payments. This is a stark contrast to the limitations of traditional finance, where intermediaries can slow down transactions and even block access to funds. Davidson goes on to advocate for clear, state-regulated legislation that protects the right to self-custody stablecoins. He highlights the distinction between commodity-backed stablecoins (like Paxos Gold) and traditional stablecoins (like Gemini Dollar), explaining how each type works. His strong opposition to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) is also noteworthy. He recognizes the potential for CBDCs to become tools of government surveillance and control, a concern shared by many in the crypto community. This clear and insightful commentary on stablecoins and their potential benefits earns him a well-deserved perfect score of 100. He understands the transformative power of this technology and is working to ensure its responsible development within a free and open market.

Congressman Warren Davidson continues to be a strong advocate for sound money and the benefits of stablecoins. His recent tweet thread on stablecoin legislation is a must-read for anyone interested in the future of finance. He correctly points out two key advantages of stablecoins over traditional bank deposits: reserve requirements and self-custody. The Silicon Valley Bank collapse highlighted the risks of fractional reserve banking, while stablecoins offer the security of 1:1 or higher reserves, often with regular audits. He also emphasizes the importance of self-custody, enabling permissionless and near-instantaneous payments. This is a stark contrast to the limitations of traditional finance, where intermediaries can slow down transactions and even block access to funds. Davidson goes on to advocate for clear, state-regulated legislation that protects the right to self-custody stablecoins. He highlights the distinction between commodity-backed stablecoins (like Paxos Gold) and traditional stablecoins (like Gemini Dollar), explaining how each type works. His strong opposition to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) is also noteworthy. He recognizes the potential for CBDCs to become tools of government surveillance and control, a concern shared by many in the crypto community. This clear and insightful commentary on stablecoins and their potential benefits earns him a well-deserved perfect score of 100. He understands the transformative power of this technology and is working to ensure its responsible development within a free and open market.