DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsFAQs

Made to help create more economic freedom.

DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Home
>
US Congress Bills
>
HR2392

Is The Bill "STABLE Act of 2025" Crypto Friendly?

Description:

This bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in the United States. It defines payment stablecoins and permitted issuers, mandating 1:1 reserves in high-quality assets, regular audits, and public disclosures. The legislation creates approval pathways for both federally and state-chartered entities to issue stablecoins and clarifies that self-custody of digital assets is not subject to the bill's restrictions. It also includes a two-year moratorium on new algorithmic stablecoins.

Date Introduced:

2025-03-26

Status:

Introduced and Sponsored

Stance on Crypto:

Very Pro-Crypto

Links:

  • https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr2392/BILLS-119hr2392rh.pdf
  • https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/2392
  • https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/119/hr2392

Primary Commentary:
Add Bill Commentary

This bill is highly significant for the crypto industry, primarily for providing much-needed regulatory clarity for stablecoins. Stablecoins are treated as a huge net positive, and this legislation aims to integrate them into the financial system with clear "rules of the road." A major pro-crypto signal is Section 15, which explicitly amends multiple securities acts to state that payment stablecoins, issued by permitted entities, are not securities. This directly counters current regulatory uncertainty and the SEC's stance, reducing a significant barrier to lawful crypto activity. The bill also includes an explicit carve-out for self-custody in Section 3(d), a strong pro-crypto protection.

The framework establishes robust compliance measures such as 1:1 reserve requirements, monthly attestations, and AML/CFT protocols. While these are standard regulatory burdens, they are part of legitimizing the industry rather than restricting it. The prohibition on stablecoin issuers paying yield and the two-year moratorium on new algorithmic stablecoins (Section 11) are restrictive elements. However, given the past failures of algorithmic stablecoins and the focus on safety for payment stablecoins, these may be viewed as prudent risk mitigation rather than broad anti-crypto measures, especially within an otherwise enabling framework. Overall, the bill fosters a regulated environment for stablecoins to thrive, encouraging adoption and integration.

Congress members who support this bill

Sponsors

Profile picture of Bryan Steil
Bryan Steil

Cosponsors

Republicans

Profile picture of Marlin Stutzman
Marlin Stutzman
Profile picture of Troy Downing
Troy Downing
Profile picture of Dan Meuser
Dan Meuser
Profile picture of Tim Moore
Tim Moore
Profile picture of Mike Haridopolos
Mike Haridopolos
Profile picture of Young Kim
Young Kim
Profile picture of William Timmons IV
William Timmons IV
Profile picture of John Rose
John Rose
Profile picture of Zach Nunn
Zach Nunn
Profile picture of Mike Lawler
Mike Lawler
Profile picture of Bill Huizenga
Bill Huizenga
Profile picture of French Hill
French Hill
Profile picture of Tom Emmer Jr.
Tom Emmer Jr.

Democrats

Profile picture of Josh Gottheimer
Josh Gottheimer
Profile picture of Sam Liccardo
Sam Liccardo
Profile picture of Shri Thanedar
Shri Thanedar
Profile picture of Ritchie Torres
Ritchie Torres

Additional Commentary

No additional commentary for this bill yet